Author Topic: SX100 IS  (Read 61319 times)

Offline martinF

  • Rookie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: SX100 IS
« Reply #15 on: 11 / February / 2008, 22:44:30 »
  • Publish
  • I have dissasembled the firmware dump and resolved the names of procedures. Can someone continue
    with that, because I have no experience with DryOS porting and I don't own a Canon SX 100.

    canonsx100-1.00b-romdata_feb11.idb - 7.22MB

    Offline Anaglyphic

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 125
    Re: SX100 IS
    « Reply #16 on: 16 / February / 2008, 20:33:24 »
  • Publish
  • Hey folks...

    Apparently mine is also a 1.00C unit.

    Code: [Select]
    Canon Powershot SX100 IS
    P-ID:315E NT D

    Firmware Ver GM1.00C
    NoError
    Aug 29 2007   15:27:50

    Adj Ver.009.005

    Total Shoot  :1285
    Open Shutter :0
    Close Shutter:0

    Thanks to VMark for the SX100 specific blink package, adc/dec compiled and dumped easily under MinGW32. If the addresses are wrong blame him. :P The flashy-flashy capture bit took 2:15. I dumped it twice, the better of the two, adc generated 3 sync errors, and dec had no errors at all. Sound like a good dump?

    cannon_sx100_firmware_100c_anaglyphic_dump.dat.bz2 - 1.66MB

    Also for those that can't / won't compile for Windows, here are the binaries: sx100_adc_dec_win32.zip - 11kB. (VMark feel free to add these to your SX100 package, they are MinGW32 console builds.)

    martinF - could you (or anyone with the tools & ability) disassemble this one also? IDA Pro Free doesn't support it.
    Since we cannot know all that there is to be known about anything,
     we ought to know a little about everything.
    -- Blaise Pascal

    Offline tiagofz6n

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 2
    Re: SX100 IS
    « Reply #17 on: 16 / February / 2008, 23:02:20 »
  • Publish
  •  Cool some progress...

     What needs to be done after this ?
     If there's anything i can do to help...

    Offline Newstech

    • Rookie
    • *
    • Posts: 19
    Re: SX100 IS
    « Reply #18 on: 19 / February / 2008, 18:34:28 »
  • Publish
  • Hoooray for you, Anaglyphic!!!!   I have 1.00C and was hoping someone would get a dump of it.  Thank you.

    Offline VMark

    • Rookie
    • *
    • Posts: 8
    Re: SX100 IS
    « Reply #19 on: 11 / March / 2008, 22:54:01 »
  • Publish
  • Hello all,

    I will add Anaglyphic's Win32 console progies ::) and chech the difference between 1.00B and 1.00C.
    Nowadays I had no time to play with my camera/firmware, another home project got focus, but sooner-later I will came back.
    Anyway, the firmware of A720IS is quite similar to ours or at least much more similar then S5IS's.

    IDA Pro Free doesn's support processors other than Intel386+ as I remember well.

    Offline Anaglyphic

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 125
    Re: SX100 IS
    « Reply #20 on: 13 / March / 2008, 17:44:11 »
  • Publish
  • Hey VMark, glad you're still around...

    heh  :haha ph3@r mY m@d 5k1LL5!  re: including the firmware dump precompiled apps, what do you think about making a SX100-specific binary using the "universal dumper - one more idea" method? Not really universal if it's coded to a specific camera, BUT at least that way, people wouldn't have to buy a photodiode and hack up a cable, just dump it to that tiny 16M card that ships with the camera.

    re: IDA Pro, yea I asked that in another thread. Oh well. Not that I have the ability anyway, but it makes learning easier.
    Since we cannot know all that there is to be known about anything,
     we ought to know a little about everything.
    -- Blaise Pascal

    Offline tah55

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 1
    Re: SX100 IS
    « Reply #21 on: 29 / March / 2008, 19:31:40 »
  • Publish
  • Another version of the Sx100 1.00C dump made with sd card and 2/diskboot.bin (not the same binaries than the other 1.00c)
    http://www.zshare.net/download/97346204f8f3f9/

    If this can help  :xmas

    Offline Ruta9

    • Rookie
    • *
    • Posts: 14
    Re: SX100 IS
    « Reply #22 on: 04 / April / 2008, 03:06:04 »
  • Publish
  • Hi guys I have a sx100 1.00c, I wish I had the knowledge enough to modify my firmware, but I'mwilling to help in any way I can to get the thing done.
    I want to have chdk running on my camera asap

    Offline RuLoXP

    • Rookie
    • *
    • Posts: 8
    Re: SX100 IS
    « Reply #23 on: 17 / April / 2008, 22:17:26 »
  • Publish
  • Hi guys. If the experts improve the firmware, will SX100 be able to shot in RAW?

    CHDK Forum

    Re: SX100 IS
    « Reply #23 on: 17 / April / 2008, 22:17:26 »

    Offline critical1

    • Rookie
    • *
    • Posts: 7
    • Powershot S5is - 1.01a
    Re: SX100 IS
    « Reply #24 on: 03 / May / 2008, 05:49:54 »
  • Publish
  • Hi Has anyone made any progress with this lately?
    Critical1
    Powershot S5is - 1.01a

    Offline RuLoXP

    • Rookie
    • *
    • Posts: 8
    Re: SX100 IS
    « Reply #25 on: 03 / May / 2008, 21:52:24 »
  • Publish
  • Could SX100 havs bracketing?

    Offline xinwen87

    • Rookie
    • *
    • Posts: 5
    Re: SX100 IS
    « Reply #26 on: 14 / May / 2008, 19:07:59 »
  • Publish
  • Hi guys. Is there anyone working on this recently?

    Offline DemonLlama

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 1
    Re: SX100 IS
    « Reply #27 on: 22 / May / 2008, 18:31:11 »
  • Publish
  • Just a nudge to show there is still interest in this model.  Doesn't appear that there's been any update in about 2 months :(

    If I had the knowledge or skill to help, believe me I would!  Any effort by the community would be greatly appreciated!

    Offline Bobsancho

    • Rookie
    • *
    • Posts: 17
    Re: SX100 IS
    « Reply #28 on: 24 / May / 2008, 23:30:27 »
  • Publish
  • I also just registered to bump this thread :) I am hoping for a CHDK before my trip in July :)


    What needs to be done right now anyway?

    Offline Hacki

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 352
    • SX100
    Re: SX100 IS
    « Reply #29 on: 27 / May / 2008, 04:04:38 »
  • Publish
  • Well. I'm also quite interestend in this topic. Bought the SX100 because of the nice price/performance ratio, well knowing there still is no chdk, but i was hoping it would be ported soon.

    So, is anyone even interestend in working on this task?  :(
    It's quite a nice cam, but with your CHDK, it would be even greater..

    Regards

     


    SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal