Ok, first results. 930 frames, from 19:17 to 23:54, with expositions ranging from 1/2000 to 60", ISO 200, shot with
A570 IS
Shot opposite to the sun, so no purple colors. At the beginning, (a few seconds in the movie), you can see a strong light in the hills, it's the sun reflecting in a large window of a house!
You can see the results here:
Sunset time-Lapse n. 4
If at all possible, look at the VERY large (22MB) original file here:
Sunset time-Lapse n. 4
Where you can see a few stars (practically invisible inthe flash version).
Again, good news and bad news.
The good news is that the thing seems to work, and once the problems are sorted the results might be impressive.
Also, in a clear sunset the light curve is very smooth, so a less sofisticated algorithm might be enough. It's all another matter if you have pathes of clouds, the sun appearing and disappearing between the clouds makes it very difficoult to compromise between a "smooth" curve and a faithful one.
This was shot opposite to the sun, if you shoot towards the sun the curve will become much harsher (don't shoot directly to the sun!)
The bad news:
1) BY MISTALE I left the script running with a debugging value (minimum step = Tv 16) so you can still see "bump" il luminosity (they are the steps in the Tv graph below). You can se these "flashes" in the movie, and as the Tv curve gets steeper and steeper, you can see the flashese get faster and faster) See the graph below. When Bv gets under -200, the step becomes 5 Tv (the script goes in "guess mode", see below) and you see that the steps alost disappear. That's why, in the last seconds of the film, the fade-in is much smoother
2) The exposition gets longer and longer. So, with a delay of 3 seconds between each shot (like in this case) you have the following:
At the beginning the movie shoots for 1/2000, then waits for 3".
At the end it shoots for 60 seconds, hangs about 30 seconds for image post-processing, then waits another 3 seconds
So, at the beginning we have a shot every 3 seconds, at the end we have a shot every 93 seconds. (the numbers aren't real, but you get the point)
This means that the playback time is greatly compressed in the "night" portion. The firs half of the movie gets about 850 frames, the second half gets about 80 frames.
The middle part, whee the sky gets progressively darker and darker, is boring in the movie because the sky gets darker, the camera exposes more and it seems nothing is changing 😀
I should have started with a larger delay to start with, but the problem stays.
Probably the solution would be to increase exposure time up to a certain point (let's say 15 seconds) and then start increasing Sv, not Tv (increasing ISO, not lengthening shutter time)
3) Stars almost completely disappear when compressing the movie. They are wonderful in the uncompressed fom, but that's 1.4 Gb 😀
Some post-processing (or compressing) trick must be studied, but probably this problem is less severe with other subjects (e.g. the lights of a town)
4) the script goes in "guess mode" when Tv < -200 (see post above) so the script in its current form is good for sunsets but not for sunrising. Will have to wake up early to get a Bv curve for a sunrising. I guess for all practical purposes it's lke having a sunset reversed, but I want to see the Bv curve in the very dark portion, to see how the large "steps" below -200 appear and try to cope with them
Ok, I will give it another try tonight and then release the script (it's yet in a very unpolished form, with no parameters etc.)
Thanks to the ones that gave me their parameters, they have helped a lot!