lglass
pretty brazen thing to say...
i have no reason to lie to anybody and i wouldn't know if the canon guy was bullshitting me or not....
Given these facts
1) the actual hack, as made in this forum, only loads from the card
2) you've clearly stated in your earlier posts that you unfamiliar with the technical details
3) you claim that some unspecified "canon" guy told you something that is known to be untrue of the hack developed in this forum.
The logical conclusions are
1) you misunderstood and "canon guy" was talking about either
a) the fact that the bootflag must be modified for the hack to load at all
b) the
theoretical possibility of storing a hack in the camera
c) a different hack, unknown to the members of this forum
d) his own personal modification, unknown to the members of this forum
2) you made up the "canon guy" in the bizarre misapprehension that someone would implement/reveal this feature if you claimed it was possible
3) the "canon guy" told you something untrue, either through his own misunderstanding or deliberately.
I would personally expect something closer to #1a or #1b, but we have seen things like #2 more often than you would think.
While I wouldn't put it the way PhyrePhoX did, insisting to the people who made the hack that it does something something that it cannot actually do does not make a very good impression.