IXUS 105 / SD1300 IS porting thread

Microfunguy

4037

Re: IXUS 105 / SD1300 IS porting thread

« Reply #680 on: 09 / March / 2012, 20:47:47 »

Advertisements

Quote from: bazhuryan on 09 / March / 2012, 18:44:03

If the folder "\CRW\" is empty then the CRW and HDR file will be named - "STR_0001.*".
But the JPEG file will be have a different digits in filename (Sample: IMG_2171.JPG, STR_0001.CRW, STR_0001.HDR).

I don't think it is because the \CRW\ folder is empty.
That normally happens if they are no JPG's in your current Canon folder.
If you have at least one JPG in the folder the numbering should work fine.

The problem is caused by the Canon function that returns next image number not working properly on the first image after booting.

I do not know if CHDK has had the same problem.

I have not had time to look at every CHDK port or patch but I vaguely remember seeing in at least one build, mention of adding a delay in order to give the Canon firmware time to return the correct file number.

Can anyone remember which build that is mentioned in ?

Logged

bazhuryan

39

Re: IXUS 105 / SD1300 IS porting thread

« Reply #681 on: 10 / March / 2012, 08:28:34 »

Quote from: Microfunguy on 09 / March / 2012, 20:47:47

Quote from: bazhuryan on 09 / March / 2012, 18:44:03

If the folder "\CRW\" is empty then the CRW and HDR file will be named - "STR_0001.*".
But the JPEG file will be have a different digits in filename (Sample: IMG_2171.JPG, STR_0001.CRW, STR_0001.HDR).

That normally happens if they are no JPG's in your current Canon folder.
If you have at least one JPG in the folder the numbering should work fine.

Was at least 5 JPG files, and not one CRW, before shooting.

Badly that the new file rewrites the old with same name.

In SDM 1.85 I have not found this problem.

« Last Edit: 10 / March / 2012, 08:31:35 by bazhuryan »

Logged

P.S. Russian is my native language.

Microfunguy

4037

Re: IXUS 105 / SD1300 IS porting thread

« Reply #682 on: 10 / March / 2012, 08:50:24 »

Quote from: bazhuryan on 10 / March / 2012, 08:28:34

Was at least 5 JPG files, and not one CRW, before shooting.

After turning on the camera take one picture.

All photos after that should have the correct numbers.

Does that work ?

Quote

In SDM 1.85 I have not found this problem.

SDM 1.86 uses different code to support certain PTP functions.
However, I will look at the code and see if it can be fixed for the first RAW.

Logged

Microfunguy

4037

Re: IXUS 105 / SD1300 IS porting thread

« Reply #683 on: 11 / March / 2012, 08:35:20 »

Try this version, works on my S95 and A620 : http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17639456/DISKBOOT.BIN.IXUS105.100D

Logged

bazhuryan

39

Re: IXUS 105 / SD1300 IS porting thread

« Reply #684 on: 14 / March / 2012, 21:55:55 »

Quote from: Microfunguy on 11 / March / 2012, 08:35:20

Try this version, works on my S95 and A620 : http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17639456/DISKBOOT.BIN.IXUS105.100D

Checked. Error with incorrect names - resolved.

Logged

P.S. Russian is my native language.

bazhuryan

39

Re: IXUS 105 / SD1300 IS porting thread

« Reply #685 on: 14 / March / 2012, 22:29:55 »

I found another bug. This problem was not in the SDM 1.85.

Description:

In the setting of the camera size of photo is set smaller than 12 megapixels. For example: 5MP.

But after a reboot, the camera takes pictures with a maximum resolution - 12 megapixels.

In the setting value is the same as before the reboot (example: 5MP).

The problem is "solved" by switching resolution on a different value and return it back.
Or switch to "show pictures" mode and return from it.

Possibly it SDM makes changes when it does the initialization, when the camera starts after turning on.

Logged

P.S. Russian is my native language.