DNG has less detail than JPG for A4000 - page 5 - General Discussion and Assistance - CHDK Forum supplierdeeply
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6   Go Down

DNG has less detail than JPG for A4000

  • 52 Replies
  • 17774 Views
*

Offline Microfunguy

  • ****
  • 4037
    • StereoData Maker
Re: DNG has less detail than JPG for A4000
« Reply #40 on: 21 / June / 2013, 20:03:16 »
Advertisements
Well, I honestly cannot see any obvious difference.

Of course, a bit of sharpening could also be applied to the jpg image.
Logged
*

Offline waterwingz

  • ******
  • 12109
    • Waterwingz
Re: DNG has less detail than JPG for A4000
« Reply #41 on: 21 / June / 2013, 20:10:52 »
Quote from: Microfunguy on 21 / June / 2013, 20:03:16
Well, I honestly cannot see any obvious difference.
Time for a monitor upgrade ?

 :haha
Logged
Ported :   A1200    SD940   G10    Powershot N    G16
*

Offline acseven

  • *****
  • 647
    • 500px
Re: DNG has less detail than JPG for A4000
« Reply #42 on: 21 / June / 2013, 20:49:23 »
Another go with the raw file, lightroom 5.

The raw file has some more detail and also it doesn't have as much "rough" highlights (specular whites are softer in the raw file).
Logged
*

Offline blackhole

  • *****
  • 845
  • A590IS 101b
    • Planetary astrophotography
Re: DNG has less detail than JPG for A4000
« Reply #43 on: 22 / June / 2013, 05:20:58 »
When we mentioned calibrate the monitor, on these two links describe how this can be done without hardware additions.
http://tomislavdekovic.iz.hr/sheshnjak/kalibracija-en.html
http://fotozine.org/?knjiga=kalibracija
Logged
*

Offline Microfunguy

  • ****
  • 4037
    • StereoData Maker
Re: DNG has less detail than JPG for A4000
« Reply #44 on: 22 / June / 2013, 08:41:51 »
Do you honestly prefer the lower-contrast, less detailed RAW version in the animation below ? :-


Logged
*

Offline blackhole

  • *****
  • 845
  • A590IS 101b
    • Planetary astrophotography
Re: DNG has less detail than JPG for A4000
« Reply #45 on: 22 / June / 2013, 09:37:53 »
Quote
Do you honestly prefer the lower-contrast, less detailed RAW version in the animation below ?
Jpg looks better but there is a lot artifacts from the sharpening, which program did you use?
Logged
*

Offline outslider

  • *****
  • 761
Re: DNG has less detail than JPG for A4000
« Reply #46 on: 22 / June / 2013, 10:10:28 »
Quote from: blackhole on 22 / June / 2013, 05:20:58
When we mentioned calibrate the monitor, on these two links describe how this can be done without hardware additions.
http://tomislavdekovic.iz.hr/sheshnjak/kalibracija-en.html
http://fotozine.org/?knjiga=kalibracija

The problem is this way there's no way to calibrate appropriate level of each R,G,B channel without hardware. And this is maybe more important while talking about colors:)
Logged
if (2*b || !2*b) {
    cout<<question
}

Compile error: poor Yorick
*

Offline waterwingz

  • ******
  • 12109
    • Waterwingz
Re: DNG has less detail than JPG for A4000
« Reply #47 on: 22 / June / 2013, 10:25:39 »
Quote from: outslider on 22 / June / 2013, 10:10:28
The problem is this way there's no way to calibrate appropriate level of each R,G,B channel without hardware. And this is maybe more important while talking about colors:)
I'm still trying to find the degaussing button on my monitor ....    :blink:
Logged
Ported :   A1200    SD940   G10    Powershot N    G16
*

Offline Microfunguy

  • ****
  • 4037
    • StereoData Maker
Re: DNG has less detail than JPG for A4000
« Reply #48 on: 22 / June / 2013, 10:30:42 »
Quote from: blackhole on 22 / June / 2013, 09:37:53
which program did you use?



On this old PC (that I like because it runs XP and is connected to a large flat TV), I only have PaintShop Pro 9.
It does not support DNG.

So, I opened the JPG in PSP and the DNG with IrfanView.
I then saved the DNG as a BMP and pasted as a new layer over the JPG.
« Last Edit: 22 / June / 2013, 10:42:24 by Microfunguy »
Logged
*

Offline blackhole

  • *****
  • 845
  • A590IS 101b
    • Planetary astrophotography
Re: DNG has less detail than JPG for A4000
« Reply #49 on: 22 / June / 2013, 11:36:22 »
Quote
The problem is this way there's no way to calibrate appropriate level of each R,G,B channel without hardware. And this is maybe more important while talking about colors
For proper calibration of monitor you need a hardware calibrator, if you do not have a hardware calibrator this can help you, you can get a better color than if do not use any calibration, use google translator.
http://fotozine.org/?knjiga=kalibracija

Quote
I'm still trying to find the degaussing button on my monitor ....
Quote
.:. most CRT monitors have DEGAUSS function - use it before calibration.
Do you really still using a CRT monitor? 8)

Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Related Topics