Is RAW really necessary? Or are we skinning a hair? - page 4 - RAW Shooting and Processing - CHDK Forum supplierdeeply

Is RAW really necessary? Or are we skinning a hair?

  • 33 Replies
  • 14186 Views
*

Offline lukg

  • ***
  • 162
  • Eos 450D+18-55is+55-250is & Powershot S5is - 1.01a
Re: Is RAW really necessary? Or are we skinning a hair?
« Reply #30 on: 27 / April / 2008, 20:31:28 »
Advertisements
Here's another example of how much raw could be usefull, imho, to save a pic already taken (I had to climb a tree, put the camera inside the cage, keep in balance and avoid to fall down..and only one shot to take this pic, with sun in my face).  :D

Camera JPG
http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/1278/img1760largenj7.jpg

CameraRAW JPG
http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/8852/img1760bislargeuf4.jpg

ps. The real vision was very closed to the second image, not the first one of course.
« Last Edit: 27 / April / 2008, 20:39:17 by lukg »

*

Offline lukg

  • ***
  • 162
  • Eos 450D+18-55is+55-250is & Powershot S5is - 1.01a
Re: Is RAW really necessary? Or are we skinning a hair?
« Reply #31 on: 29 / April / 2008, 20:02:49 »
And here the opposite problem:

Camera JPG:
http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/8435/img1742gv6.jpg

RAW jpg:
http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/8558/img1742bisws5.jpg
.
Now that I tried it, I cannot live without raw  :-[  :P  :D


*

Offline lukg

  • ***
  • 162
  • Eos 450D+18-55is+55-250is & Powershot S5is - 1.01a
Re: Is RAW really necessary? Or are we skinning a hair?
« Reply #33 on: 30 / April / 2008, 18:59:33 »
What i changed in camera raw is:

White balance, exposure, recovery, fill light, brightness and contrast.


 

Related Topics