Porting: sd600/ixus60 1.00d (beta) | 1.00a (in progress) - page 4 - General Discussion and Assistance - CHDK Forum supplierdeeply

Porting: sd600/ixus60 1.00d (beta) | 1.00a (in progress)

  • 95 Replies
  • 43098 Views
Re: Porting: sd600/ixus60 1.00d (beta) | 1.00a (in progress)
« Reply #30 on: 09 / May / 2008, 15:42:06 »
Advertisements
can someone point me in the direction of a guide to compile the source?

i can get my hands on a linux machine but i haven't compiled from the command line in linux since university ;)

*

Offline PhyrePhoX

  • *****
  • 2254
  • make RAW not WAR
    • PhyreWorX
Re: Porting: sd600/ixus60 1.00d (beta) | 1.00a (in progress)
« Reply #31 on: 09 / May / 2008, 20:50:50 »
linux isnt a must, in fact in windows compiling is way easier :)
this page should provide you everything you need to know: For Developers - CHDK Wiki

Re: Porting: sd600/ixus60 1.00d (beta) | 1.00a (in progress)
« Reply #32 on: 09 / May / 2008, 22:15:44 »
Thank you for your efforts to port CHDK to the SD600.

With the A620, one had to upgrade the firmware the firmware to be able to use CHDK (ie it was never released for older firmwares). Maybe this is a silly question but, rather than porting CHDK to the 1.00a firmware, why not get people to upgrade their firmware to 1.00d?

I assume Canon have never released an official update, but would it be possible to upgrade using a firmware dumped from a camera?

Elia

Re: Porting: sd600/ixus60 1.00d (beta) | 1.00a (in progress)
« Reply #33 on: 10 / May / 2008, 02:50:05 »
Thank you for your efforts to port CHDK to the SD600.

With the A620, one had to upgrade the firmware the firmware to be able to use CHDK (ie it was never released for older firmwares). Maybe this is a silly question but, rather than porting CHDK to the 1.00a firmware, why not get people to upgrade their firmware to 1.00d?

I assume Canon have never released an official update, but would it be possible to upgrade using a firmware dumped from a camera?

I would also like to know if this is possible...  Thanks in advance.


Re: Porting: sd600/ixus60 1.00d (beta) | 1.00a (in progress)
« Reply #34 on: 16 / May / 2008, 16:38:58 »
Thanks to all that have worked on this!!!

Is there a way to turn the RAW mode off? I want to use the ultra-intervalometer script with just normal jpgs, but I can't get the <alt> mode to take any photos at all...

Re: Porting: sd600/ixus60 1.00d (beta) | 1.00a (in progress)
« Reply #35 on: 22 / May / 2008, 21:47:30 »
Bumping this thread.  Has any more work been done on the 1.00A version?  Could use a fully functional release on my SD600

Re: Porting: sd600/ixus60 1.00d (beta) | 1.00a (in progress)
« Reply #36 on: 28 / May / 2008, 10:54:48 »

Can anyone answer me, please? Is porting for sd600/ixus60 ready or not?

*

Offline tilmaen

  • *
  • 14
  • Ixus60/SD600 1.00A
Re: Porting: sd600/ixus60 1.00d (beta) | 1.00a (in progress)
« Reply #37 on: 29 / May / 2008, 03:02:01 »
i'd say it's ready when it's ready ;)


Re: Porting: sd600/ixus60 1.00d (beta) | 1.00a (in progress)
« Reply #38 on: 29 / May / 2008, 17:59:18 »
thx!

Re: Porting: sd600/ixus60 1.00d (beta) | 1.00a (in progress)
« Reply #39 on: 30 / May / 2008, 19:51:22 »
the beta binary for 1.00A seems to work fine for me. Not being too familiar with this, there are some things that don't work: I cant get the ultra intervalometer script to work. it will only take one picture it seems? I've upped the shot delay to 60 or so and it does not seem to help.

 

Related Topics