Looking for build without EXMEM - page 3 - Hello, I'm a NEWBIE - HELP!! (Newbies assistance, User Guides and thank you notes) - CHDK Forum  

Looking for build without EXMEM

  • 25 Replies
  • 6048 Views
Re: Looking for build without EXMEM
« Reply #20 on: 03 / January / 2016, 10:59:30 »
Advertisements
"I had an experimental version a while ago but that went nowhere (due to the usual lack of interest). Buried inside a big (and unrelated) patch, it's unfortunately not code_gen'd: http://chdk.setepontos.com/index.php?topic=6397.msg110349#msg110349"

This link didn't work for me.

Looking for build without EXMEM
« Reply #21 on: 03 / January / 2016, 11:01:13 »
Deleted.
« Last Edit: 03 / January / 2016, 15:30:04 by waterwingz »
Ported :   A1200    SD940   G10    Powershot N    G16

*

Offline srsa_4c

  • ******
  • 4055
Re: Looking for build without EXMEM
« Reply #22 on: 03 / January / 2016, 11:22:12 »
"I had an experimental version a while ago but that went nowhere (due to the usual lack of interest). Buried inside a big (and unrelated) patch, it's unfortunately not code_gen'd: http://chdk.setepontos.com/index.php?topic=6397.msg110349#msg110349"
I have updated that patch and it's in reyalp's latest test builds. That's why you were able to report almost 400kB of free memory here.
If you're experiencing something unusual (instability or crashes), please report it.

*

Offline srsa_4c

  • ******
  • 4055
Re: Looking for build without EXMEM
« Reply #23 on: 17 / January / 2016, 12:54:17 »
I'm wondering whether this patch is worth committing.
I don't expect receiving a lot more feedback.
It does not seem to have any positive or negative influence on Razor512's problem. It does allow taking full quality JPEG images unlike previous official releases. I also believe that the approximately ~390kB free RAM (with no badpixel data loaded) is enough for most CHDK uses.


*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 12208
Re: Looking for build without EXMEM
« Reply #24 on: 17 / January / 2016, 14:25:09 »
I'm wondering whether this patch is worth committing.
I don't expect receiving a lot more feedback.
It does not seem to have any positive or negative influence on Razor512's problem. It does allow taking full quality JPEG images unlike previous official releases. I also believe that the approximately ~390kB free RAM (with no badpixel data loaded) is enough for most CHDK uses.
I'm inclined to add it, if we get people hitting out of memory errors, we can go back to exmem.
Don't forget what the H stands for.

*

Offline msl

  • *****
  • 1263
  • A720 IS, SX220 HS 1.01a
    • CHDK-DE links
Re: Looking for build without EXMEM
« Reply #25 on: 17 / January / 2016, 14:54:24 »
This is the same situation with the sx220, ca. 380 kB free RAM. I have no Problems with the standard CHDK applications and big scripts.

msl
CHDK-DE:  CHDK-DE links

 

Related Topics