Looking for build without EXMEM

seejay

7

Re: Looking for build without EXMEM

« Reply #20 on: 03 / January / 2016, 10:59:30 »

Advertisements

"I had an experimental version a while ago but that went nowhere (due to the usual lack of interest). Buried inside a big (and unrelated) patch, it's unfortunately not code_gen'd: http://chdk.setepontos.com/index.php?topic=6397.msg110349#msg110349"

This link didn't work for me.

Logged

waterwingz

12140

« Reply #21 on: 03 / January / 2016, 11:01:13 »

Deleted.

« Last Edit: 03 / January / 2016, 15:30:04 by waterwingz »

Logged

Ported : A1200 SD940 G10 Powershot N G16

srsa_4c

4451

Re: Looking for build without EXMEM

« Reply #22 on: 03 / January / 2016, 11:22:12 »

Quote from: seejay on 03 / January / 2016, 10:59:30

"I had an experimental version a while ago but that went nowhere (due to the usual lack of interest). Buried inside a big (and unrelated) patch, it's unfortunately not code_gen'd: http://chdk.setepontos.com/index.php?topic=6397.msg110349#msg110349"

I have updated that patch and it's in reyalp's latest test builds. That's why you were able to report almost 400kB of free memory here.
If you're experiencing something unusual (instability or crashes), please report it.

Logged

srsa_4c

4451

Re: Looking for build without EXMEM

« Reply #23 on: 17 / January / 2016, 12:54:17 »

I'm wondering whether this patch is worth committing.
I don't expect receiving a lot more feedback.
It does not seem to have any positive or negative influence on Razor512's problem. It does allow taking full quality JPEG images unlike previous official releases. I also believe that the approximately ~390kB free RAM (with no badpixel data loaded) is enough for most CHDK uses.

Logged

reyalp

14117

Re: Looking for build without EXMEM

« Reply #24 on: 17 / January / 2016, 14:25:09 »

Quote from: srsa_4c on 17 / January / 2016, 12:54:17

I'm wondering whether this patch is worth committing.
I don't expect receiving a lot more feedback.
It does not seem to have any positive or negative influence on Razor512's problem. It does allow taking full quality JPEG images unlike previous official releases. I also believe that the approximately ~390kB free RAM (with no badpixel data loaded) is enough for most CHDK uses.

I'm inclined to add it, if we get people hitting out of memory errors, we can go back to exmem.

Logged

Don't forget what the H stands for.