SX520HS Porting thread. - page 21 - DryOS Development - CHDK Forum

SX520HS Porting thread.

  • 209 Replies
  • 52619 Views
Re: SX520HS Porting thread.
« Reply #200 on: 07 / April / 2017, 06:41:35 »
Advertisements

Can't you just select a white balance in Raw Therapee?
Yes, but with these presets the colours are quite not accurate, that's obvious even for me (I'm partially colorblind, not totally), so that's still not a solution.

*

Offline blackhole

  • *****
  • 778
  • A590IS 101b
    • Planetary astrophotography
Re: SX520HS Porting thread.
« Reply #201 on: 07 / April / 2017, 08:29:04 »
Quote
Yes, but with these presets the colours are quite not accurate, that's obvious even for me (I'm partially colorblind, not totally), so that's still not a solution.
If you want I can make a few test versions with a different color matrix, maybe you will find something more suitable for you. None of them will not have the same colors as JPEG.

Re: SX520HS Porting thread.
« Reply #202 on: 10 / April / 2017, 04:46:53 »
If you want I can make a few test versions with a different color matrix
Yep, that would be great. I was thinking about purchasing something like this: http://xritephoto.com/colorchecker-passport-photo - I heard it can help with the issue I have, but it is even more expensive than my camera.

*

Offline momo

  • *
  • 16
Re: SX520HS Porting thread.
« Reply #203 on: 10 / April / 2017, 09:26:03 »
I was thinking about purchasing something like this: http://xritephoto.com/colorchecker-passport-photo - I heard it can help with the issue I have, but it is even more expensive than my camera.
Wolf Faust offers inexpensive and usable reflective color targets ( http://www.targets.coloraid.de/ ). Problem is, one needs to write some code to do color calibration; I’m not aware of any ready-made software. However, one can ask Dave Coffin (dcraw, https://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/ ). He is familiar with Wolf’s targets and used to be quite cooperative. The added advantage is that the camera will then be included in dcraw.


*

Offline Heitor

  • *
  • 4
  • sx520hs 100c
Re: SX520HS Porting thread.
« Reply #204 on: 28 / August / 2020, 14:45:10 »
Hello CHDK team,

Is it possible to address the <alt> button to some of these two useless framing assist buttons aside the camera?I think it's only permitted to use playback, trash can and brecketting buttons.

Thank you for the awesome job you do.

*

Offline blackhole

  • *****
  • 778
  • A590IS 101b
    • Planetary astrophotography
Re: SX520HS Porting thread.
« Reply #205 on: 29 / August / 2020, 03:14:00 »
Hello CHDK team,

Is it possible to address the <alt> button to some of these two useless framing assist buttons aside the camera?I think it's only permitted to use playback, trash can and brecketting buttons.

Thank you for the awesome job you do.
It can be done, but I don't know what version of the firmware your camera has.

*

Offline Heitor

  • *
  • 4
  • sx520hs 100c
Re: SX520HS Porting thread.
« Reply #206 on: 30 / August / 2020, 15:35:36 »
100c

Thank you.

*

Offline blackhole

  • *****
  • 778
  • A590IS 101b
    • Planetary astrophotography
Re: SX520HS Porting thread.
« Reply #207 on: 31 / August / 2020, 05:03:39 »
100c

A custom version where the buttons on the lens barrel can be used as the <ALT> button.


*

Offline Heitor

  • *
  • 4
  • sx520hs 100c
Re: SX520HS Porting thread.
« Reply #208 on: 31 / August / 2020, 11:48:51 »
Thank you so much. I'm gonna test it and reply. I know it's been a long time since the last reply, but would be nice if it may be avaliable on trunk link. Maybe I'm not the only one with this demand.

*

Offline Heitor

  • *
  • 4
  • sx520hs 100c
Re: SX520HS Porting thread.
« Reply #209 on: 31 / August / 2020, 12:31:55 »
Works awesome, as expected. Thanks a lot!

 

Related Topics