ixus175_elph180_100c porting attempt - page 20 - DryOS Development - CHDK Forum supplierdeeply
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21   Go Down

ixus175_elph180_100c porting attempt

  • 201 Replies
  • 107604 Views
*

Offline waterwingz

  • ******
  • 12140
    • Waterwingz
Re: ixus175_elph180_100c porting attempt
« Reply #190 on: 01 / September / 2018, 19:05:24 »
Advertisements
Quote from: reyalp on 01 / September / 2018, 16:56:03
I added A/D support for all the lipo battery cameras I have in trunk  r5062, including elph180.
Yea - I probably knew that if I'd thought about it a bit more.  This means we can remove the two superfluous  #defines and speed up the build a bit   ::)
Logged
Ported :   A1200    SD940   G10    Powershot N    G16
*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14117
Re: ixus175_elph180_100c porting attempt
« Reply #191 on: 01 / September / 2018, 19:41:29 »
Quote from: waterwingz on 01 / September / 2018, 19:05:24
This means we can remove the two superfluous  #defines and speed up the build a bit   ::)
To be clear, I only added it for cameras I could personally test, not all the lipo battery cameras.

The A/D channel and values are different on digic 6 at least, so I'd be hesitant to enable it everywhere unless we had sigfinder detection of the battery type and A/D channel.
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
*

Offline waterwingz

  • ******
  • 12140
    • Waterwingz
Re: ixus175_elph180_100c porting attempt
« Reply #192 on: 02 / September / 2018, 13:43:03 »
Quote from: reyalp on 01 / September / 2018, 19:41:29
To be clear, I only added it for cameras I could personally test, not all the lipo battery cameras.
My collection of cameras does not overlap yours AFAIK.  Is there a list of which ones you did to save me some grep time, as
Code: [Select]
#define CAM_REMOTE_AtoD_CHANNEL   5   
is only used twice.

Also, are all Canon battery packs (i.e. not AA cameras) lipo? Or is there a mix of NiMH, NiCd and Li-ion ?
Logged
Ported :   A1200    SD940   G10    Powershot N    G16
*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14117
Re: ixus175_elph180_100c porting attempt
« Reply #193 on: 02 / September / 2018, 17:26:01 »
Quote from: waterwingz on 02 / September / 2018, 13:43:03
Also, are all Canon battery packs (i.e. not AA cameras) lipo? Or is there a mix of NiMH, NiCd and Li-ion ?
I was actually just using it as a shorthand for Canon-proprietary non-AA. It's possible they made some with different chemistry but the vast majority (if not all) have a thermistor terminal.

Quote
My collection of cameras does not overlap yours AFAIK.  Is there a list of which ones you did
In the current trunk CAM_REMOTE_AtoD_CHANNEL is set for
D10
g7x *
ixus120_sd940
ixus140_elph130
ixus175_elph180
sx200is
sx710is *

* = channel 3, 12 bit ADC


edit:
If you are adding remote inputs, the AV detect and HDMI would be welcome too of course.
« Last Edit: 02 / September / 2018, 17:28:14 by reyalp »
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
*

Offline waterwingz

  • ******
  • 12140
    • Waterwingz
Re: ixus175_elph180_100c porting attempt
« Reply #194 on: 02 / September / 2018, 23:00:43 »
Seems that I have not done a SVN uodate in a while.
Logged
Ported :   A1200    SD940   G10    Powershot N    G16
*

Offline charge

  • *
  • 4
Re: ixus175_elph180_100c porting attempt
« Reply #195 on: 01 / October / 2018, 16:56:41 »
Quote from: reyalp on 04 / June / 2018, 01:55:03
Based on sigfinder output, firmware 100a and 100b should be able to use the same build as 100c (except for the compatibility check).

Here's a test build set to load on those firmwares for anyone who has those has them. Please report if it works. It almost certainly will.

Hi, I have an ixus 175 with the 100b firmware. I tried the attached zip supplied, but noticed there wasn't a PS.F12 included.
I tried to use the PS.F12 from the latest 100c Autobuild, but the firmware update failed.
I then tried to use the 100c Autobuild itself, but as expected this failed to work and I had to take out the camera's battery.
Anyone got a test version of 100b I could try?
Thanks

*Update* I looked into further options and found the EOScard.exe tool and got the attached zip version to work. Anything I should test specifically to help get the 100b into the autobuild?
« Last Edit: 01 / October / 2018, 17:12:28 by charge »
Logged
*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14117
Re: ixus175_elph180_100c porting attempt
« Reply #196 on: 02 / October / 2018, 00:28:22 »
Quote from: charge on 01 / October / 2018, 16:56:41
*Update* I looked into further options and found the EOScard.exe tool and got the attached zip version to work. Anything I should test specifically to help get the 100b into the autobuild?
Thanks for reporting. I've enabled 100b in the autobuild. Since it's a copy it really should be fine and not need additional testing.

You will probably want update to the autobuild version when it shows up (should be in the next 30 minutes or so), there have been some bug fixes since that test build.
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
*

Offline charge

  • *
  • 4
Re: ixus175_elph180_100c porting attempt
« Reply #197 on: 04 / October / 2018, 16:00:07 »
Quote from: reyalp on 02 / October / 2018, 00:28:22
Quote from: charge on 01 / October / 2018, 16:56:41
*Update* I looked into further options and found the EOScard.exe tool and got the attached zip version to work. Anything I should test specifically to help get the 100b into the autobuild?
Thanks for reporting. I've enabled 100b in the autobuild. Since it's a copy it really should be fine and not need additional testing.

You will probably want update to the autobuild version when it shows up (should be in the next 30 minutes or so), there have been some bug fixes since that test build.
I have tried the Autobuild version and I haven't found any issues, thanks for enabling it. The only nitpick is that the spashscreen says 100c rather than 100b, probably due to it being a copy  ;)
Logged
*

Offline joanllm

  • *
  • 3
Re: ixus175_elph180_100c porting attempt
« Reply #198 on: 27 / August / 2019, 10:34:21 »
Quote from: reyalp on 04 / June / 2018, 01:55:03
Based on sigfinder output, firmware 100a and 100b should be able to use the same build as 100c (except for the compatibility check).

Here's a test build set to load on those firmwares for anyone who has those has them. Please report if it works. It almost certainly will.

hello good, I'm Joan, new in this world, I recently acquired an ixus 175 to install the chdk and shoot raw, the problem is that my firmware is 100a, I can't install the chdk correctly, can someone give me a hand if it's possible?
And tried to use your version for the firmware update but the camera does not detect the firmware with your download files.

I hope help, thank you very much for your work!
Logged
*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14117
Re: ixus175_elph180_100c porting attempt
« Reply #199 on: 27 / August / 2019, 12:51:21 »
Quote from: joanllm on 27 / August / 2019, 10:34:21
hello good, I'm Joan, new in this world, I recently acquired an ixus 175 to install the chdk and shoot raw, the problem is that my firmware is 100a, I can't install the chdk correctly, can someone give me a hand if it's possible?
And tried to use your version for the firmware update but the camera does not detect the firmware with your download files.
That build didn't have the firmware update file included. You can try the one attached here.

You can also use Stick (http://zenoshrdlu.com/stick/stick.html) to installed downloaded zips using the unofficial build option.
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Related Topics
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal