Improving CHDK ND filter support - page 15 - General Discussion and Assistance - CHDK Forum

Improving CHDK ND filter support

  • 201 Replies
  • 40284 Views
*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 841
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #140 on: 08 / August / 2019, 20:07:02 »
Advertisements
13 more from the IXUS family, should be all on the original list.
Didn't hunt for any ones I didn't have when I made that list.
Will do that after completing all on it...

The very first few DIGIC II models don't have a full-blown capt_seq task and don't have all the hooks.
Turned out to be Ixus 30,40,50.

*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 841
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #141 on: 08 / August / 2019, 20:32:03 »
Turns out I had that wrong... Ixus aren't done yet...
I have misplaced my 105,130,200,220,300,750,1000 still looking for 'em.
Found my 240, so here that is.
« Last Edit: 08 / August / 2019, 20:33:49 by koshy »

*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 841
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #142 on: 08 / August / 2019, 20:46:45 »
Found 'em...

The Ixus 1000 is trouble.
That port has been trouble in multiple ways if I recall that right, what didn't we fuss with that one camera.

*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 841
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #143 on: 08 / August / 2019, 21:31:56 »
Ok, this does it for the day. The Ixus cameras on my list are now really all touched once.
Ixus 200 and TX1 do not have ND.

@reyalp this was the list to cross complete ones off of I think: https://chdk.setepontos.com/index.php?topic=13228.msg139338#msg139338


*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 12004
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #144 on: 08 / August / 2019, 22:23:38 »
Thanks  :D

It'll take me a while to work through those. In the meantime, here's a test build for ixus970_sd890-100c.

It appears the PutInNDFilter and PutOutNDFilter stubs were reversed. This build uses the sig finder values, which are actually a different set of functions but probably equivalent.
Don't forget what the H stands for.

*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 841
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #145 on: 09 / August / 2019, 07:04:45 »
In the meantime, here's a test build for ixus970_sd890-100c.
Test result attached.

*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 12004
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #146 on: 09 / August / 2019, 17:01:14 »
In the meantime, here's a test build for ixus970_sd890-100c.
Test result attached.
Thanks, that one appears to work fine now, changes checked in for 1.4 and 1.5.
Don't forget what the H stands for.

*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 841
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #147 on: 09 / August / 2019, 17:34:27 »
Thanks, that one appears to work fine now, changes checked in for 1.4 and 1.5.
Nice, so this is actually useful. I'll go through the 33 A-Series cameras as I find the time and you'll just request any re-testing of the others as needed. I'll have to force myself to actually do the A-Series cameras asap I guess...


*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 12004
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #148 on: 11 / August / 2019, 02:42:13 »
Nice, so this is actually useful.
Yes, definitely. It's good for finding bugs like this, and the data from the successful will be a big help too.
Quote
I'll go through the 33 A-Series cameras as I find the time and you'll just request any re-testing of the others as needed. I'll have to force myself to actually do the A-Series cameras asap I guess...
No rush ;)

It looks like ixus85_sd770 had the same problem as ixus970_sd890, test build attached.
Don't forget what the H stands for.

*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 841
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #149 on: 11 / August / 2019, 13:39:25 »
No rush ;)
Recall what happend last time you said "No rush", there was a good but sad reason for that though, life got in the way.

 

Related Topics