Improving CHDK ND filter support - page 15 - General Discussion and Assistance - CHDK Forum  

Improving CHDK ND filter support

  • 234 Replies
  • 102497 Views
*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 1096
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #140 on: 08 / August / 2019, 20:07:02 »
Advertisements
13 more from the IXUS family, should be all on the original list.
Didn't hunt for any ones I didn't have when I made that list.
Will do that after completing all on it...

The very first few DIGIC II models don't have a full-blown capt_seq task and don't have all the hooks.
Turned out to be Ixus 30,40,50.
Koshy had a little ELPH which wasn't white as snow but everywhere that Koshy went the ELPH was sure to go. (actually an SD, but that detail ruins the rhyme...)

*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 1096
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #141 on: 08 / August / 2019, 20:32:03 »
Turns out I had that wrong... Ixus aren't done yet...
I have misplaced my 105,130,200,220,300,750,1000 still looking for 'em.
Found my 240, so here that is.
« Last Edit: 08 / August / 2019, 20:33:49 by koshy »
Koshy had a little ELPH which wasn't white as snow but everywhere that Koshy went the ELPH was sure to go. (actually an SD, but that detail ruins the rhyme...)

*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 1096
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #142 on: 08 / August / 2019, 20:46:45 »
Found 'em...

The Ixus 1000 is trouble.
That port has been trouble in multiple ways if I recall that right, what didn't we fuss with that one camera.
Koshy had a little ELPH which wasn't white as snow but everywhere that Koshy went the ELPH was sure to go. (actually an SD, but that detail ruins the rhyme...)

*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 1096
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #143 on: 08 / August / 2019, 21:31:56 »
Ok, this does it for the day. The Ixus cameras on my list are now really all touched once.
Ixus 200 and TX1 do not have ND.

@reyalp this was the list to cross complete ones off of I think: https://chdk.setepontos.com/index.php?topic=13228.msg139338#msg139338
Koshy had a little ELPH which wasn't white as snow but everywhere that Koshy went the ELPH was sure to go. (actually an SD, but that detail ruins the rhyme...)


*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14098
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #144 on: 08 / August / 2019, 22:23:38 »
Thanks  :D

It'll take me a while to work through those. In the meantime, here's a test build for ixus970_sd890-100c.

It appears the PutInNDFilter and PutOutNDFilter stubs were reversed. This build uses the sig finder values, which are actually a different set of functions but probably equivalent.
Don't forget what the H stands for.

*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 1096
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #145 on: 09 / August / 2019, 07:04:45 »
In the meantime, here's a test build for ixus970_sd890-100c.
Test result attached.
Koshy had a little ELPH which wasn't white as snow but everywhere that Koshy went the ELPH was sure to go. (actually an SD, but that detail ruins the rhyme...)

*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14098
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #146 on: 09 / August / 2019, 17:01:14 »
In the meantime, here's a test build for ixus970_sd890-100c.
Test result attached.
Thanks, that one appears to work fine now, changes checked in for 1.4 and 1.5.
Don't forget what the H stands for.

*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 1096
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #147 on: 09 / August / 2019, 17:34:27 »
Thanks, that one appears to work fine now, changes checked in for 1.4 and 1.5.
Nice, so this is actually useful. I'll go through the 33 A-Series cameras as I find the time and you'll just request any re-testing of the others as needed. I'll have to force myself to actually do the A-Series cameras asap I guess...
Koshy had a little ELPH which wasn't white as snow but everywhere that Koshy went the ELPH was sure to go. (actually an SD, but that detail ruins the rhyme...)


*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14098
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #148 on: 11 / August / 2019, 02:42:13 »
Nice, so this is actually useful.
Yes, definitely. It's good for finding bugs like this, and the data from the successful will be a big help too.
Quote
I'll go through the 33 A-Series cameras as I find the time and you'll just request any re-testing of the others as needed. I'll have to force myself to actually do the A-Series cameras asap I guess...
No rush ;)

It looks like ixus85_sd770 had the same problem as ixus970_sd890, test build attached.
Don't forget what the H stands for.

*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 1096
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #149 on: 11 / August / 2019, 13:39:25 »
No rush ;)
Recall what happend last time you said "No rush", there was a good but sad reason for that though, life got in the way.
Koshy had a little ELPH which wasn't white as snow but everywhere that Koshy went the ELPH was sure to go. (actually an SD, but that detail ruins the rhyme...)

 

Related Topics


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal