Improving CHDK ND filter support - page 9 - General Discussion and Assistance - CHDK Forum
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 24   Go Down

Improving CHDK ND filter support

  • 234 Replies
  • 119592 Views
*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14138
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #80 on: 05 / July / 2018, 21:47:35 »
Advertisements
A fix I added for ixus175_elph180 in r5064 may be relevant to other cameras and the larger ND project.

The ND would go in or out on half press as expected, but would go back to the Canon firmware value for the actual shot. The override is in the usual location, and the other overrides worked normally.

The workaround is to set AV and AV2 propcases as the Canon firmware would when it uses the ND. This both fixes the override, and makes the ND override show as aperture in the exif it would if the Canon firmware activated it.
This is enabled by defining CAM_ND_SET_AV_VALUE to the ND filter value to 1 (edit: the value is now determined from Canon firmware functions). I got the value from GetUsableMaxAv - GetUsableMinAv, but unfortunately these functions aren't available on all ND-only cameras.

IMO, setting the propcase is better behavior even on cameras that don't require it, since it makes the behavior more like the Canon firmware. This only make sense for ND-only cameras, since cameras with both don't account for the ND in the AV value.

On some ND-only cameras (elph130 and elph180 at least), setting the AV propcases in halfpress alone is sufficient to control the ND for the shot. Unlike using PutInNDFilter, this doesn't show up in half press live view (it does show up in the displayed Av). The values require to set the ND in or out don't appear to need to be exact: E.g. if the values the camera would set with and without ND 686 and 328, setting 500 or 700 put the ND in, and 329 or 200 put it out.
« Last Edit: 27 / January / 2019, 19:01:51 by reyalp »
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14138
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #81 on: 08 / July / 2018, 02:58:39 »
Quote from: koshy on 11 / June / 2018, 18:03:49
So, to sum it up, is it conceivable that IXUS 1000 has neither ND filter nor Iris and all it displays in terms of AV/TV in reality is being done by shutter?
I think this is very unlikely. It seems clear the camera doesn't have a normal ND filter, and does have something else. The first test did seem to show clear exposure differences for Av change.

It's quite possible that CHDK overrides don't work correctly.
Quote
Overriding that to "Inf"inity via CHDK doesn't do it. Setting Infinity on the Canon FW doesn't change it either;
According to the source, you must set either MF or AF Lock for CHDK focus override to work.
In chdkptp, you can do this with =set_mf(true) or =set_aflock(true)

The Canon "focus at infinity" setting is just a hint, as you've noticed, the camera still does an AF scan, it just favors far distance.
You should be able to AF lock in the canon firmware by clicking the focus mode button while holding half shoot.

Quote
With "ND in" I get a much darker live view upon half press and hold than with "ND out" but the actual photos with all three overrides are identical.
This sounds similar to what I described for the elph180 above, but that workaround doesn't really make sense if there isn't an actual ND filter. You could try overriding both AV and ND at the same time and see if it makes the exposure change reliably
e.g. -nd=in -av=9 and nd=out -av=4
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
*

Offline srsa_4c

  • ******
  • 4451
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #82 on: 08 / July / 2018, 15:17:57 »
Quote from: reyalp on 05 / July / 2018, 21:47:35
I got the value from GetUsableMaxAv - GetUsableMinAv, but unfortunately these functions aren't available on all ND-only cameras.
The underlying fw function (which delivers both minimum and maximum Av) can be found on a larger set of cameras. Newer DryOS era is the easiest, older models are probably more difficult. Question is, do we want to use the exact offset, or just get away with a sufficiently large value?
And, of course, do you plan to enable this for all ND only cameras?
Logged
*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14138
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #83 on: 08 / July / 2018, 15:23:57 »
@koshy
Looking at the firmware code a650, sx10 and sx20, I'd be interested to see results for ND on one of these. I've attached a build for sx10 102b with ND filter control enabled.  Just taking shots in P mode with ND in and OUT on a scene with some depth should be fine for now.

Also, one thing you could try with ixus1000 is CHDK bracketing in continuous mode.

I'd suggest:
Use a scene where the camera the chooses full wide (e.g. indoor or not direct sun)
Under CHDK enhanced photo -> bracketing in continuous mode
AV Bracketing 2/3 EV
Bracket type -

Set the camera to continuous mode, and shoot 3 or more shots in a burst.
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14138
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #84 on: 08 / July / 2018, 16:39:13 »
Quote from: srsa_4c on 08 / July / 2018, 15:17:57
The underlying fw function (which delivers both minimum and maximum Av) can be found on a larger set of cameras. Newer DryOS era is the easiest, older models are probably more difficult.
Yeah, I noticed that too, not sure if it's worth finding for ND cameras. It is nice to have identified for analysis. I've been calling it GetUsableAvRange

For ND filter, I think we can get the value directly. I'm still trying to figure out the best way to get it in the sig finder, and what to do with the oddballs

Some notes
All (or almost all, still need to check verified all have except the M3 and M10) cameras have ReloadNdFilterAdjustment. The underlying function also appears in the jumptable API.
On cameras without an ND, this function is noop (return, return 0, possibly with some veneers)

On cameras with an ND, it sets a pointer in a struct associated with the ND task, which includes a short with the actual ND value. I verified / found this on d10, elph130, elph180 and g7x. The fact that's its associated with adjustment data suggests it may vary per camera.

There are also other functions that get this value in the ND code. On ND-only cameras, GetUsableAvRange ends up calling one of them. There are also functions that get the current ND value (0 if out, ND value if in), which in turn gives a way to get the current ND state.

With the ND value available directly, there's less need for GetUsableAvRange on ND-only cameras.

Some functions I've identified
get_nd_value: returns the APEX96 value of ND.  Firmwares often have two identical copies. This value is always available, even in play mode.
elph130
ff3502dc, ff35031c. value @ *(short *)(0xCF48+0x34)

elph180
ffad8eec, ffad8f2c. value @ *(short *)(0xB5B4+0x34)

d10
Code is a bit different, appears to call a zoom related function, but result doesn't seem to depend on zoom
ffa39d2c, ffa39d94 value @*(short *)(0x9918+0x30)

g7x
fc3cf6e4, fc3cf712. value @*(short *)(0x00026c90+0x34)

get_current_nd_value: returns 0 if out, nd value if in. Firmwares have two or more identical (except for assert line numbers) copies. Calls a function that returns 0/1 for ND state.

elph130
ff35027c, ff3502ac, ff3502ec

elph180
ff35027c, ff3502ac, ff3502ec

d10
ffa39d50, ffa39ce8

g7x
fc3cf6a8, fc3cf6ee,

Underlying function called by ReloadNdFilterAdjustment
elph130: ff434d18

elph180: ffbb55fc

d10: ffab52e0

g7x: fc502c4c (code is somewhat different from the others)
« Last Edit: 08 / July / 2018, 17:07:26 by reyalp »
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 1096
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #85 on: 08 / July / 2018, 17:17:21 »
Quote from: reyalp on 08 / July / 2018, 15:23:57
@koshy
Looking at the firmware code a650, sx10 and sx20, I'd be interested to see results for ND on one of these.
OK, I'll try to get that done tomorrow or Tuesday.
Logged
Koshy had a little ELPH which wasn't white as snow but everywhere that Koshy went the ELPH was sure to go. (actually an SD, but that detail ruins the rhyme...)
*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14138
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #86 on: 08 / July / 2018, 19:14:57 »
Here's an updated version of shell script and spreadsheet from https://chdk.setepontos.com/index.php?topic=13228.msg136275#msg136275

The OS and PID columns allow sorting in roughly chronological order (but PIDs are not exactly in sequence with release date).

IrisActuator.c and NdActuator.c seem to be the most reliable indicators. The tasks are similarly reliable except on very early cams. ReloadNdFilterAdjustment not being noop may also indicate real ND, but I haven't checked all. ReloadIrisAdjustment appears to have some code even on ND only cams.

The EOSM cams have neither Iris not ND tasks / .c files, which makes sense.

Starting around ixus160 (DryOS 55p6, 2014), Canon exposed more AV related eventprocs on ND only cams, including GetUsableMinAv and GetCurrentIrisPosition.

Cameras with open questions are:

* a650, sx1, sx10, sx20. All have what looks like ND code, but aren't defined as ND. ReloadNdFilterAdjustment does something on these cams. Manuals and online specs don't  appear to mention ND.

ixus1000_sd4500 - unclear, code looks like it should be Av only, port has problems

sx400 - looks like it should be Av only, like sx410.

As of trunk 5069, I removed the ND define from tx1, ixus200 (based on koshy testing and firmware code) and sx260 (which I missed in the earlier cleanup)
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 1096
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #87 on: 10 / July / 2018, 12:39:58 »
Quote from: reyalp on 08 / July / 2018, 15:23:57
I've attached a build for sx10 102b with ND filter control enabled.  Just taking shots in P mode with ND in and OUT on a scene with some depth should be fine for now.
The override did not have any effect. In and Out are the same. http://www.filedropper.com/sx10nd
Logged
Koshy had a little ELPH which wasn't white as snow but everywhere that Koshy went the ELPH was sure to go. (actually an SD, but that detail ruins the rhyme...)
*

Offline srsa_4c

  • ******
  • 4451
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #88 on: 10 / July / 2018, 16:43:16 »
Quote from: reyalp on 08 / July / 2018, 16:39:13
get_nd_value: returns the APEX96 value of ND.
Code: [Select]
Index: tools/finsig_dryos.c
===================================================================
--- tools/finsig_dryos.c (revision 5071)
+++ tools/finsig_dryos.c (working copy)
@@ -335,6 +335,7 @@
     { "exmem_alloc" },
     { "exmem_free", OPTIONAL|LIST_ALWAYS },
     { "free" },
+    { "get_nd_value", OPTIONAL },
 
     { "kbd_p1_f" },
     { "kbd_p1_f_cont" },
@@ -2092,6 +2093,7 @@
     { 23, "get_string_by_id", "NoError", 16,                                    99,     99,     99,     99,     99,     99,     99,     99,     99,     99,     99,     99,     99,     99,     99,     -2 },
     { 23, "EnableHDMIPower", "HDMIConnectCnt", 9,                               99,     99,      1,      1,      1,      1,      1,      1,      1,      1,      1,      1,      1,      1,      1,      1,},
     { 23, "DisableHDMIPower", "HDMIConnectCnt", 9,                              99,     99,      3,      3,      3,      3,      3,      3,      3,      3,      3,      3,      3,      3,      3,      3,},
+    { 23, "get_nd_value", "IrisSpecification.c", 25,                            -1,     -1,     -1,     -1,     -1,     -1,     -1,     -1,     -1,     -1,     -1,     -1,     -1,     -1,     -1,     -1,},
 
     //                                                                           R20     R23     R31     R39     R43     R45     R47     R49     R50     R51     R52     R54     R55     R57     R58     R59
     { 24, "get_string_by_id", "StringID[%d] is not installed!!\n", 64,           0xf000, 0xf000, 0xf000, 0xf000, 0xf000, 0xf000, 0xf000, 0xf000, 0xf000, 0xf000, 0xf000, 0xf000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0xf000 },
Index: tools/finsig_vxworks.c
===================================================================
--- tools/finsig_vxworks.c (revision 5071)
+++ tools/finsig_vxworks.c (working copy)
@@ -338,6 +338,7 @@
     { "exmem_alloc" },
     { "exmem_free", OPTIONAL },
     { "free" },
+    { "get_nd_value", OPTIONAL },
 
     { "kbd_p1_f" },
     { "kbd_p1_f_cont" },
@@ -1312,6 +1313,7 @@
     { 15, "wrapped_malloc", "\n malloc error \n", 0x01000001,                    0x0010 },
     { 15, "IsStrobeChargeCompleted", "\r\nCaptSeq::ChargeNotCompleted!!", 0x01000001 }, // ixus30, 40
     { 15, "get_resource_pointer", "Not found icon resource.\r\n", 0x01000001,    0x0008 },
+    { 15, "get_nd_value", "IrisSpecification.c", 0x01000001 },
 
     { 16, "DeleteDirectory_Fut", (char*)DeleteDirectory_Fut_test, 0x01000001 },
     { 16, "MakeDirectory_Fut", (char*)MakeDirectory_Fut_test, 0x01000001 },
This appears to find get_nd_value on almost all ND-only models - exceptions are the ixus 30 and 40. Did not verify the results yet.
The presence of "IrisSpecification.c" seems like a good indicator for an ND-only camera.
Logged
*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14138
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #89 on: 11 / July / 2018, 02:14:14 »
Quote from: srsa_4c on 10 / July / 2018, 16:43:16
This appears to find get_nd_value on almost all ND-only models - exceptions are the ixus 30 and 40. Did not verify the results yet.
Nice. I haven't had time to check whether it's correct, but the code found for earlier cams like ixus700_sd500 seems quite different.

ixus700_sd500 also has eventprocs like "NdActuator.IsNdFilterActive" "NdActuator.GetNdFilterDeltaEv", "NdActuator.GetNdFilterDeltaEvAdjustValue"


Quote
The presence of "IrisSpecification.c" seems like a good indicator for an ND-only camera.
Agreed. Comparing with my spreadsheet, only ixus 30 and 40 don't seem to match. I noticed that string before, but assumed it must be present on iris cams too  :-[
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 24   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Related Topics


SimplePortal © 2008-2014, SimplePortal