Improving CHDK ND filter support - page 17 - General Discussion and Assistance - CHDK Forum
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 ... 24   Go Down

Improving CHDK ND filter support

  • 234 Replies
  • 110131 Views
*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 1096
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #160 on: 12 / August / 2019, 16:57:47 »
Advertisements
Quote from: reyalp on 12 / August / 2019, 16:33:54
The only other DryOS R43 cams with ND filter are untested: A3000, ixus105_sd1300.
Only one half of that is true  ;)
This is a re-post (I hope, if it's not I missed including it)
Logged
Koshy had a little ELPH which wasn't white as snow but everywhere that Koshy went the ELPH was sure to go. (actually an SD, but that detail ruins the rhyme...)
*

Online reyalp

  • ******
  • 14125
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #161 on: 12 / August / 2019, 17:00:30 »
Quote from: koshy on 12 / August / 2019, 16:57:47
Only one half of that is true  ;)
This is a re-post (I hope, if it's not I missed including it)
You're right I missed it. This one has the same problem as the other r43 cams.
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
*

Offline Caefix

  • *****
  • 948
  • Sorry, busy deleting test shots...
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #162 on: 13 / August / 2019, 14:21:52 »
Hi again!
Here´s some done homework, tables from the cams I transported today,
++ Easy renamer, writes a Batchfile for double_mouse_click_event per default.
++ Quicklooker for mouse_drag&draw : ListiX.bat

if %~x1?==? (cmd /T:4E/Kdir/b/ad/s/on %1) else (cmd /T:1F/K type %0 %*|find /N "need")

enjoy, Caefix
Logged
All lifetime is a loan from eternity.
*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 1096
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #163 on: 13 / August / 2019, 14:54:29 »
Quote from: Caefix on 13 / August / 2019, 14:21:52
Here´s some done homework, tables from the cams I transported today
Great, 6 newer ones I don't have, or don't have anymore. Thank you.
Logged
Koshy had a little ELPH which wasn't white as snow but everywhere that Koshy went the ELPH was sure to go. (actually an SD, but that detail ruins the rhyme...)
*

Online reyalp

  • ******
  • 14125
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #164 on: 13 / August / 2019, 15:26:41 »
Quote from: Caefix on 13 / August / 2019, 14:21:52
Hi again!
Here´s some done homework, tables from the cams I transported today,
Thanks!

There are some issues related to settings in some of these logs. It would be helpful if you can do N and SX610HS with the following:

* Set the camera shooting mode to P
* Set ISO to manual, like 80 or 100
* Enable continuous shooting in the Canon firmware
* Make sure the camera is aimed at something without much contrast, like a wall, a blank page on a computer screen, or the sky.

This isn't urgent, if it's inconvenient there's no need.
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
*

Offline Caefix

  • *****
  • 948
  • Sorry, busy deleting test shots...
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #165 on: 14 / August / 2019, 14:02:21 »
2nd Service... :xmas
« Last Edit: 15 / August / 2019, 11:19:04 by Caefix »
Logged
All lifetime is a loan from eternity.
*

Online reyalp

  • ******
  • 14125
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #166 on: 17 / August / 2019, 19:45:42 »
Thanks Caefix

@koshy: A530 failed because the usb remote hook wasn't enabled. This isn't one of the super old cameras that doesn't support, the code looks just like A540, so I posted a test build in https://chdk.setepontos.com/index.php?topic=5305.msg141080#msg141080

If you can check the remote functionality as well as re-running the ndtest script, that would be helpful.

ixus230_elph310 similarly failed because the remote hook isn't present. I'll try to put a build for that later.

Since the list post is still broken here's list of remaining untested or failed cameras with ND.

The coverage of ND-only cameras like plenty to me. It would be nice to have some additional results from the G / Gn X / S cams with the current script. Maybe @c_joerg, @philmoz, @waterwingz ?

It would also be helpful to find / confirm PROPCASE_ND_FILTER_STATE for propset 1 (G7) and propset 3 (G11) (done)

For propset 3, I think the ID is probably 194. This can be verified with the propset viewer and changing the ND state through the Canon UI.

For propset 1, using one of the propset dump / compare scripts https://chdk.fandom.com/wiki/PropertyCase or chdkptp would be best.


a2200
a2300
a2600
a3100 - Dry r43 TV and AV prop overrides in quick appear to fail, ND control seems to work
a3000 - Dry r43 TV and AV prop overrides in quick appear to fail, ND control seems to work
a3300
a490 - Dry r43 TV and AV prop overrides in quick appear to fail, ND control seems to work
a495 - Dry r43 TV and AV prop overrides in quick appear to fail, ND control seems to work
a530 - remote hook missing (test build available) fixed
d20
d30
g10
g11
g12
g15
g16
g1x
g5x
g9
ixus1000_sd4500 - port has problems, ND status unclear
ixus105_sd1300 - Dry r43 TV and AV prop overrides in quick appear to fail, ND control seems to work
ixus130_sd1400 - Dry r43 TV and AV prop overrides in quick appear to fail, ND control seems to work
ixus132_elph115
ixus135_elph120
ixus145_elph135
ixus160_elph160
ixus170_elph170
ixus185
ixus230_elph310hs - missing remote hook (fixed)
ixus255_elph330hs
ixus285_elph360hs
ixus30_sd200 - missing remote hook (old VX)
ixus300_sd4000 - Dry r43 TV and AV prop overrides in quick appear to fail, ND control seems to work
ixus310_elph500hs - ND + iris ixus, philmoz fixed remote hook
ixus40_sd300  - missing remote hook (old VX)
ixus50_sd400  - missing remote hook (old VX)
ixus700_sd500  - missing remote hook (old VX)
n_facebook - (non facebook passed, so almost certainly fine)
s110

« Last Edit: 05 / September / 2019, 23:00:21 by reyalp »
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
*

Offline waterwingz

  • ******
  • 12140
    • Waterwingz
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #167 on: 17 / August / 2019, 20:51:07 »
My office is a mess at the moment but I found my box of cameras buried deep.  I can run the test on my G10, G16, and SD4000.   Once I figure out what to do - should I be using a recent unstable build?

(Edit 1: To save me some time scrolling - what are the most current instructions please?)
(Edit 2: Thanks @koshy )

« Last Edit: 17 / August / 2019, 21:07:29 by waterwingz »
Logged
Ported :   A1200    SD940   G10    Powershot N    G16
*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 1096
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #168 on: 17 / August / 2019, 21:01:11 »
Quote from: waterwingz on 17 / August / 2019, 20:51:07
My office is a mess at the moment but I found my box of cameras buried deep.  I can run the test on my G10, G16, and SD4000.   Once I figure out what to do - should I be using a recent unstable build?
Use a trunk build yes, the ND test script can be updated in scripts/test folder to the attached, then set a fixed low iso, set FW to continuous shooting, turn flash off, turn review in Canon Menu off. Point camera at a blank wall, maybe just rest it on something execute script and it will just happily shoot away.
Logged
Koshy had a little ELPH which wasn't white as snow but everywhere that Koshy went the ELPH was sure to go. (actually an SD, but that detail ruins the rhyme...)
*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 1096
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #169 on: 17 / August / 2019, 21:02:27 »
Quote from: reyalp link=topic=13228.msg141082#msg141082
For propset 1, using one of the propset dump / compare scripts [url
https://chdk.fandom.com/wiki/PropertyCase[/url] or chdkptp would be best.
This script gave this result on G7, is it what you wanted?
Logged
Koshy had a little ELPH which wasn't white as snow but everywhere that Koshy went the ELPH was sure to go. (actually an SD, but that detail ruins the rhyme...)
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 ... 24   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Related Topics


SimplePortal © 2008-2014, SimplePortal