Improving CHDK ND filter support - page 22 - General Discussion and Assistance - CHDK Forum supplierdeeply
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 [22]   Go Down

Improving CHDK ND filter support

  • 216 Replies
  • 43460 Views
*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 12158
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #210 on: 05 / September / 2019, 22:39:27 »
Advertisements
Quote from: Caefix on 05 / September / 2019, 13:39:58
8) All tests passed with pleasure.
Thanks for testing. I checked the changes in, trunk r5265
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
*

Online koshy

  • *****
  • 975
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #211 on: 06 / September / 2019, 21:24:57 »
Added and or re-added a few cameras to the flock.
One more was on your ND Test want list...
Logged
*

Offline Caefix

  • **
  • 54
  • Sorry, busy deleting test shots...
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #212 on: 13 / September / 2019, 13:20:22 »
 :) Missing stamp, just budgetable...
« Last Edit: 14 / September / 2019, 10:22:30 by Caefix »
Logged
All lifetime is a loan from eternity.
*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 12158
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #213 on: 14 / September / 2019, 14:02:48 »
Quote from: Caefix on 13 / September / 2019, 13:20:22
:) Missing stamp, just budgetable...
I'm not clear what this means, or what the image is supposed to show? The first ndtest.csv you posted for this camera seems fine. The second one (BETA2) shows some variation, it looks like variation in lighting to me.
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
*

Offline Caefix

  • **
  • 54
  • Sorry, busy deleting test shots...
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #214 on: 14 / September / 2019, 14:27:01 »
[=) First .csv done with (wrong) iso to auto setting, 2nd. with an accident during test.
Hope, 3rd is OK now. .Jpg shows it´s another cam with distortion after set_zoom.
Logged
All lifetime is a loan from eternity.
*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 12158
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #215 on: 14 / September / 2019, 18:19:47 »
Quote from: Caefix on 14 / September / 2019, 14:27:01
[=) First .csv done with (wrong) iso to auto setting, 2nd. with an accident during test.
Hope, 3rd is OK now. .Jpg shows it´s another cam with distortion after set_zoom.
Thanks. The first one was actually fine, I suggested fixed ISO to limit possible sources of confusion, but auto should nomrally work.

On the zoom issue, it looks like this port isn't using  CAM_USE_ALT_SET_ZOOM_POINT / CAM_USE_ALT_PT_MoveOpticalZoomAt. I'll post a test build with that later in the porting thread https://chdk.setepontos.com/index.php?topic=10150.50 unless it's been tried already.

In general, if you find port specific bugs it's better to post them in the porting thread with a description of the issue. You can usually find the porting thread linked from the camera wiki page.

Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
*

Offline Caefix

  • **
  • 54
  • Sorry, busy deleting test shots...
Re: Improving CHDK ND filter support
« Reply #216 on: 13 / October / 2019, 12:21:45 »
 ( ( ( ( :)
Around reply #207 You did some memory improvement.
I remember Ixus230 had ~400k free mem, now it´s 500+.
Other cams around 400k are S90, SX210, 220 & 230, probably more.
Could they profit from Your magic touch too?
Logged
All lifetime is a loan from eternity.
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 [22]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Related Topics