ASSERT!! FocusLensController.c Line 203 - page 2 - General Discussion and Assistance - CHDK Forum
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

ASSERT!! FocusLensController.c Line 203

  • 12 Replies
  • 4079 Views
*

Offline RaduP

  • *****
  • 926
Re: ASSERT!! FocusLensController.c Line 203
« Reply #10 on: 18 / February / 2021, 17:36:44 »
Advertisements
Yes, I 3d printed a Canon EF to C mount adapter, and it works well. Take a look here (for EF to C mount): https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4497990
There is no Python library (that I am aware of) for Canon lenses, but it's relatively simple to do it in C: https://web.media.mit.edu/~bandy/invariant/move_lens.pdf
Logged
*

Offline c_joerg

  • *****
  • 1251
Re: ASSERT!! FocusLensController.c Line 203
« Reply #11 on: 19 / February / 2021, 02:08:10 »
Quote from: RaduP on 18 / February / 2021, 16:04:34
Just curious, why not just use the high res (12mp) camera that comes with the Pi? It has a higher resolution than the A640, and you won't have to retract/extend the lens each time you start it up.
https://forum.lrtimelapse.com/Thread-sunrise-in-alcorcon-raspberrypi-camerahq?pid=48172#pid48172
A cheap Canon Powershoot with CHDK on it you get better results...
Logged
M100 100a, M3 121a, G9x II (1.00c), 2*G1x (101a,100e), S110 (103a), SX50 (100c), SX230 (101a), S45,
Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/136329431@N06/albums
YouTube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrTH0tHy9OYTVDzWIvXEMlw/videos?shelf_id=0&view=0&sort=dd
*

Offline RaduP

  • *****
  • 926
Re: ASSERT!! FocusLensController.c Line 203
« Reply #12 on: 19 / February / 2021, 07:03:50 »
I have many timelapses with CHDK. All of the videos on my channel, except for the last one are done with CHDK: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpBheuWzDrqMQOXxWGlXglg
The last one is with a program I wrote for Android (specifically for a Samsung S8) and it has the advantage that it can run for days without an external battery.

I agree that Canon + CHDK produces great results, however there are always other considerations out there, such as how feasible it is. If I'd want a remote, outdoor thing without easy access to electricity, I wouldn't go on the Canon way. Also, I am not sure how well the exposure was set on that Sony sensor, but I think it can do better than that.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Related Topics


SimplePortal © 2008-2014, SimplePortal