Canon IXUS 900 Ti / Powershot SD900 1.00C Port - page 18 - General Discussion and Assistance - CHDK Forum supplierdeeply

Canon IXUS 900 Ti / Powershot SD900 1.00C Port

  • 262 Replies
  • 128213 Views
*

Offline pixeldoc2000

  • ****
  • 356
  • IXUS900Ti 1.00C, IXUS300HS 1.00D
    • pixel::doc homebase
Re: Canon IXUS 900 Ti / Powershot SD900 1.00C Port
« Reply #170 on: 12 / March / 2009, 16:28:00 »
Advertisements
UPDATE

Download Beta v21. Look at my first Post.

There is the set_backlight function that doesn't work.

This one is very important to me. Hopefully you'll find a way to make it work.

Thanks.
set_backlight script command FIXED
Done.
 :)

I use .dng format in Raw Therapee on my SD990 and after editing the image I save to CRW_XXXX.jpg the exif data is taken from the matching .jpg file.  The problem is I found that I can't get my SD900 to use .dng format,   The Badpixel script created a file called bad_tmp.bin  I renamed it badpixel.bin and it will allow me to set the .dng  file option but the image is corrupt.  I ran the script 5 times but no luck.   I am also testing CHDK on my SD990 and .dng  works on that cam.   Anyone had success with .dng on the 900
No, DNG convert on Camera does not work yet.

I still need to find out how to correct cam_CFAPattern and COLORMATRIX.

camera.h
Code: [Select]
    // pattern
    #define cam_CFAPattern 0x02010100
    // color ToDo
    #define CAM_COLORMATRIX1                               \
      661014, 1000000, -189364, 1000000, -115797, 1000000, \
     -168772, 1000000,  661827, 1000000,   47392, 1000000, \
      -35846, 1000000,  107148, 1000000,  233705, 1000000
    #define cam_CalibrationIlluminant1 1   // Daylight (is this first selectable Illuminant Calibration mode ?)
« Last Edit: 12 / March / 2009, 17:24:13 by pixeldoc2000 »

Re: Canon IXUS 900 Ti / Powershot SD900 1.00C Port
« Reply #171 on: 12 / March / 2009, 23:08:51 »
set_backlight script command FIXED
Done.
 :)

YES!!!!!!! It works! Good job! :D  :D  :D

Re: Canon IXUS 900 Ti / Powershot SD900 1.00C Port
« Reply #172 on: 13 / March / 2009, 01:16:22 »
UPDATE
I still need to find out how to correct cam_CFAPattern and COLORMATRIX.

G7 settings in DNG for PowerShot-2 seems to work good. Would you try to use the same?

Re: Canon IXUS 900 Ti / Powershot SD900 1.00C Port
« Reply #173 on: 13 / March / 2009, 11:29:10 »
has any one figured out the correct min and max voltage for the NB-5L within chdk?
canon powershot sd900 ti
canon digital ixus 500
canon powershot s400
flickr


Re: Canon IXUS 900 Ti / Powershot SD900 1.00C Port
« Reply #174 on: 14 / March / 2009, 11:16:20 »
I use 3975 / 3425  this seems to be close
It is better to burn a roll of film than curse the darkness Equip, S100 w/CHDK, SD900 w/CHDK, SD990 w/CHDK & Pentax K2000, Pentax Kr
Flickr:

Re: Canon IXUS 900 Ti / Powershot SD900 1.00C Port
« Reply #175 on: 16 / March / 2009, 18:05:23 »
sorry for possible offtop
is there any chance to access camera's static remap list (and add a 'bad pixel' there) thru the chdk core?

Re: Canon IXUS 900 Ti / Powershot SD900 1.00C Port
« Reply #176 on: 19 / March / 2009, 07:38:26 »
i tried "motion detection" script from wiki, and it works great! :)
and i would also like to save DNG instead RAW (and JPG also). so it would be nice to have this feature (also with a bad-pixel correction possibility).
« Last Edit: 19 / March / 2009, 07:41:09 by redstorm »

*

Offline pixeldoc2000

  • ****
  • 356
  • IXUS900Ti 1.00C, IXUS300HS 1.00D
    • pixel::doc homebase
Re: Canon IXUS 900 Ti / Powershot SD900 1.00C Port
« Reply #177 on: 26 / March / 2009, 17:06:04 »
G7 settings in DNG for PowerShot-2 seems to work good. Would you try to use the same?
Yes, results are ok.
I've tried several times to create camera profile in dng2ps2, but was not able to get proper results yet. Maybe somebody else give it a try?

I use 3975 / 3425  this seems to be close
This sould work, but only if your battery is quite fresh and not some chinese gargabe ;-)

sorry for possible offtop
is there any chance to access camera's static remap list (and add a 'bad pixel' there) thru the chdk core?
Why? i have to fix dng support in chdk, this should be enough.
There is (currently) no such function in chdk. But your free to give it a try ;-) . You can find the tables (if the are any) in the firmware dump.

i tried "motion detection" script from wiki, and it works great!
and i would also like to save DNG instead RAW (and JPG also). so it would be nice to have this feature (also with a bad-pixel correction possibility).
DNG support is still in clue!


*

Offline PhyrePhoX

  • *****
  • 2254
  • make RAW not WAR
    • PhyreWorX
Re: Canon IXUS 900 Ti / Powershot SD900 1.00C Port
« Reply #178 on: 17 / April / 2009, 15:53:51 »
thought about adding the beta to the trunk, so collaboration could be made easier, but i didnt find a patch/diff.
hust wanted to let you know ;)

Re: Canon IXUS 900 Ti / Powershot SD900 1.00C Port
« Reply #179 on: 27 / April / 2009, 04:43:45 »
hi @ all,
we are now using this port on the ixus 900ti, and it works good,
just the buttonlayout is somehow strange (as is use chdk on the ixus 960is, and there are just more buttons available)

now the question, the focal distance overridesetting in the menu rocks... :) just the quick-setting with the zoombuttons and the selectionwheel does'nt, is there something we do wrong? is there a setting we forgot?

The factor and the sd-value is displayed, but can't be altered in "realtime" :) , only in the menu...


is there a software that converts the raw-files in other, more compatible raw-files, so we cann reprocess them in lightroom or something equal? The gimp-raw-plugin works good, but still we are missing some features, lightroom has...

Thanks for all your great work!!!! please go on with that... soon canon can fire theire developers and just keep on using chdk on theire cams ;)

with regards from germany,
Thomas

 

Related Topics