the sx10 porting thread - page 42 - General Discussion and Assistance - CHDK Forum
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 ... 62   Go Down

the sx10 porting thread

  • 613 Replies
  • 355447 Views
*

Offline patdop

  • *
  • 3
Re: the sx10 porting thread
« Reply #410 on: 25 / June / 2009, 10:21:32 »
Advertisements
very great and quick job to reach to put CHDK working with 1.02b firmware.
I just have put it on my 32GB memory card, and it works. have not tested nothing for the moment just reach to put it on a SD larger than 4GB. next step test it.

Thank you so much.
Logged
*

Offline tool46

  • *
  • 10
Re: the sx10 porting thread
« Reply #411 on: 25 / June / 2009, 14:35:06 »
Quote from: nimrod on 25 / June / 2009, 01:09:29
Quote from: reyalp on 25 / June / 2009, 00:29:51
...meaning that I've verified it somehow (usually by watching it with "misc debug vals").

I seem to have left my camera in the car or something and I'm too lazy to go get it, but I'm guessing that what you're talking about is in the Debug menu in the standard build, and you're probably not talking about the memory browser.


For everyone:

So we have 1.01a, 1.01b, and 1.02b covered now.... I haven't heard too many people clamoring for 1.00c just yet. I'm willing to work on it, but I need at least one person to test builds (or to send me a 1.00c camera) and more than one to convince me it's worth the effort :)

Also, just out of curiosity, where are people getting 1.00c cameras? I just bought one and it was 1.02b. I get the feeling that what you end up with mostly depends on when you buy the thing, but does it also depend on where? (In this I'm assuming "you" are buying a recently manufactured new camera and not "old new stock" from early last year or whatever.)


Hey nimrod  I would be glad to test builds for the GM 1.00c . I got mine at Best Buy in Alexandria Virginia in Oct 2008. Buy the way there have been many that have asked for it starting back at Reply #8. I want to say thanks to everyone that has worked on the sx10.
« Last Edit: 25 / June / 2009, 18:43:00 by tool46 »
Logged
sx10is eos 50d eos 1Ds Mark II eos 5D Mark II
*

Offline Fusius

  • *
  • 1
Re: the sx10 porting thread
« Reply #412 on: 25 / June / 2009, 18:04:05 »
Quote from: nimrod on 25 / June / 2009, 01:09:29
Quote from: reyalp on 25 / June / 2009, 00:29:51
...meaning that I've verified it somehow (usually by watching it with "misc debug vals").

I seem to have left my camera in the car or something and I'm too lazy to go get it, but I'm guessing that what you're talking about is in the Debug menu in the standard build, and you're probably not talking about the memory browser.


For everyone:

So we have 1.01a, 1.01b, and 1.02b covered now.... I haven't heard too many people clamoring for 1.00c just yet. I'm willing to work on it, but I need at least one person to test builds (or to send me a 1.00c camera) and more than one to convince me it's worth the effort :)

Also, just out of curiosity, where are people getting 1.00c cameras? I just bought one and it was 1.02b. I get the feeling that what you end up with mostly depends on when you buy the thing, but does it also depend on where? (In this I'm assuming "you" are buying a recently manufactured new camera and not "old new stock" from early last year or whatever.)

Hi.  I'm pretty new on here but i've been following the posts.  I too would like to test any builds you create for v1.00C.  And as someone else pointed out, there are lots of folks who have firmware v1.00C on their cams.  I don't know about them, but I bought mine in Dec. 2008 from Best Buy in Washington, DC. 
Logged
*

Offline cormac

  • *
  • 46
Re: the sx10 porting thread
« Reply #413 on: 25 / June / 2009, 20:10:59 »
I've done some work towards getting 1.00c working, but I've been having issues with it crashing that I'm trying to debug.

If someone wants to take my code and run with it, I'll upload it.

Cormac
Logged
*

Offline nimrod

  • *
  • 33
Re: the sx10 porting thread
« Reply #414 on: 25 / June / 2009, 20:35:08 »
cormac: Please upload and I'll see what I can do.
Logged
*

Offline cormac

  • *
  • 46
Re: the sx10 porting thread
« Reply #415 on: 25 / June / 2009, 22:25:11 »
Quote from: nimrod on 25 / June / 2009, 20:35:08
cormac: Please upload and I'll see what I can do.

Heres the files: http://drop.io/wltyjxn

This was zipped from CHDK\trunk\trunk776\platform\sx10\sub\100c

There's probably something simple I've missed. I'm thinking that the FlashParamsTable might be wrong, but I can't see an alternative location.
« Last Edit: 25 / June / 2009, 22:27:50 by cormac »
Logged
*

Offline jetherson

  • *
  • 12
Re: the sx10 porting thread
« Reply #416 on: 25 / June / 2009, 22:30:01 »
Hi!

I have 1.00c and I ordered it from Amazon last October 2008 (delivered around first week of November 2008).

Quote
... I haven't heard too many people clamoring for 1.00c just yet. ...
That means we're patiently hoping and waiting.  :)

I am really hoping (patiently) that a chdk version for 1.00c will be made soon.

Ciao!

-jet
Logged
*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14126
Re: the sx10 porting thread
« Reply #417 on: 25 / June / 2009, 22:38:15 »
I've added nimrods 101b port to svn, should be on the autobuild server shortly.

regarding 103a, someone should try to get a new dump.
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
*

Offline nimrod

  • *
  • 33
Re: the sx10 porting thread
« Reply #418 on: 26 / June / 2009, 00:14:54 »
Quote from: cormac on 25 / June / 2009, 22:25:11
There's probably something simple I've missed. I'm thinking that the FlashParamsTable might be wrong, but I can't see an alternative location.

Ok, I downloaded everything and will start looking at it tomorrow. Right now it's a bit late to get started tonight.

Approximately what has been done so far and what have you tried for debugging? Also, when it crashes what happens? Does it die and lock the camera before any leds even come on, does it get to where the "Canon" screen comes up and then die, etc.
Logged
*

Offline cormac

  • *
  • 46
Re: the sx10 porting thread
« Reply #419 on: 26 / June / 2009, 01:38:16 »
Quote from: nimrod on 26 / June / 2009, 00:14:54
Quote from: cormac on 25 / June / 2009, 22:25:11
There's probably something simple I've missed. I'm thinking that the FlashParamsTable might be wrong, but I can't see an alternative location.

Ok, I downloaded everything and will start looking at it tomorrow. Right now it's a bit late to get started tonight.

Approximately what has been done so far and what have you tried for debugging? Also, when it crashes what happens? Does it die and lock the camera before any leds even come on, does it get to where the "Canon" screen comes up and then die, etc.

What has been done so far:
boot.c, capt_seq.c, stubs_min.s, stubs_entry2.S  have been completely ported (relevant addresses changed when needed), and I'm in the process of double checking my edits.

The big jump tables in capt_seq.c:capt_seq_task were pulled in from a .asm export as it was getting tedious editing every address. I didn't see any extra code in there that I missed, but I might have gotten an address wrong in the bits I was doing before I got bored and pulled in the asm file.

Just realised that movie_rec.c hasn't been touched at all. Totally missed it. Maybe that's the issue. I'm going to see if I can get that changed tonight and see if that fixed it.

When it crashes:
Canon startup image displays, Blue led blinks once, red led comes on for 19 seconds, then it reboots.

Debugging:
So far I was looking at path through the code, just to make sure that there wasn't a label or function reference that I'd somehow changed that broke functionality. After this was I going to start putting in blue led blinks at certain points and seeing if it gets called, but I haven't done this.
« Last Edit: 26 / June / 2009, 02:20:16 by cormac »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 ... 62   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Related Topics


SimplePortal © 2008-2014, SimplePortal