supplierdeeply

the sx10 porting thread

  • 613 Replies
  • 142265 Views
  • Publish
    Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
    « Reply #70 on: 13 / March / 2009, 06:27:16 »
    Advertisements
    FF83DDF4 RefreshUSBMode
    FF87EC9C PostLogicalEventForNotPowerType

    Thanks.

    For cameras with a playback pushbutton, these parameters seem to work :-

    RECORD    0x1001
    PLAYBACK 0x1003
    MOVIE       0x9A5


    Cannot get it to work on the A550 though.

    *

    Offline amg

    • *
    • 1
  • Publish
    Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
    « Reply #71 on: 13 / March / 2009, 06:39:22 »
    Hi All,

    Do you think HD video recording can be enabled on the SX10? I think the difference between SX1 and SX10 is only the sensor and the SX200 can record 720p video with a CCD sensor very similar to the one in SX10.

    Also, can faster continuous shooting rates be enabled by CHDK? As the camera can do about 3.6fps in ISO3200 mode (2MP) it seems that the 1.4fps limit in all other modes (including regular 2MP and even 0.3MP) is a limitation imposed by the firmware.

    *

    Offline ewavr

    • ****
    • 1057
    • A710IS
  • Publish
    Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
    « Reply #72 on: 13 / March / 2009, 10:49:36 »
    Some investigations about 12-bit RAW.
    I inspected pixel values statistics for SX10 using show_stat program.

    ISO80, 1/1000s, lens closed by cover (format is: pixel_value   pixel_count):

    Code: [Select]
    0 5239 (bad pixels)
    1 0
    2 0
    <skip>
    <near to black level>
    108 475
    109 0
    110 0
    111 17
    112 22602
    113 0
    114 0
    115 153
    116 274120
    117 0
    118 0
    119 252
    120 1529611
    121 0
    122 0
    123 0
    124 3548186
    125 0
    126 0
    127 0
    128 3462915
    129 0
    130 0
    131 0
    132 1263513
    133 0
    134 0
    135 0
    136 196005
    137 0
    138 0
    139 0
    140 8536
    141 0
    142 0
    143 0
    144 195

    Real image, ISO 80, 1/60 s
    Code: [Select]
    2028 3748
    2029 0
    2030 0
    2031 0
    2032 3566
    2033 0
    2034 0
    2035 0
    2036 3649
    2037 0
    2038 0
    2039 0
    2040 3482
    2041 0
    2042 0
    2043 0
    <white level>
    4088 607
    4089 0
    4090 0
    4091 0
    4092 286320
    4093 0
    4094 0
    4095 0

    Real image, ISO80, 5 s, NR=off
    Code: [Select]
    672 11048
    673 250
    674 127
    675 49
    676 10945
    677 238
    678 121
    679 56
    680 10829
    681 243
    682 123
    683 42

    You still think that the 12-bit ADC means 12-bit measurement accuracy?  :haha

    *

    Offline fe50

    • ******
    • 3034
    • IXUS50 & 860, SX10 Star WARs-Star RAWs
      • fe50
  • Publish
    Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
    « Reply #73 on: 13 / March / 2009, 13:31:03 »
    SX10 1.01A updated: added wheel support, multipartition support, RAW sum/average for 12-bit RAW (to do: curves and RAW subtract  for 12-bit RAW).
    Forget about video bitrate change (no MJPEG inside?).
    Binaries + scr: http://ewavr.nm.ru/chdk/for_test/

    Wheel support & multipartition setup (8GB, 2MB+ restMB) with swapping via menu works fine, also the 3rd ALT-shortcut (video button)  :)
    Quote

    You still think that the 12-bit ADC means 12-bit measurement accuracy?  Grin
    not really  ;)


  • Publish
    Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
    « Reply #74 on: 13 / March / 2009, 14:31:52 »
    You still think that the 12-bit ADC means 12-bit measurement accuracy?  :haha

    But it seems to be 10 bit, still better than the 8 bit JPEGs.

    *

    Offline fe50

    • ******
    • 3034
    • IXUS50 & 860, SX10 Star WARs-Star RAWs
      • fe50
  • Publish
    Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
    « Reply #75 on: 13 / March / 2009, 18:34:12 »
    SX10 1.01A updated

    Also successfully tested:
    - Power on in record mode (hold power btn)
    - MD (fudgey's MDFB-080914), ~85ms most time, rarely ~100 ms reaction time
    - Tv bracketing (- mode, + mode, +/- mode)
    - Subj. Dist. bracketing
    - LED's (all working)
    - User menu (uses the AF frame selector / Delete button for selection)

    *

    Offline ewavr

    • ****
    • 1057
    • A710IS
  • Publish
    Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
    « Reply #76 on: 13 / March / 2009, 20:16:56 »
    Updated again - RAW subtraction is patched for 12-bit support, some minor fixes.
    Curves are removed from this build, because I have no idea how to patch it for 12-bit support.

    @fe50
    Many thanks for testing. Since I'm newbee as CHDK user, I can't test all its features  ;)

    that does not work:
    - Auto NR with shutter speed override;
    - shutter speed override (and maybe other overrides), if shutter button is pressed quickly.
    So far, I have no idea how to fix it.

    *

    Offline ewavr

    • ****
    • 1057
    • A710IS
  • Publish
    Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
    « Reply #77 on: 14 / March / 2009, 19:43:40 »
    - shutter speed override (and maybe other overrides), if shutter button is pressed quickly.
    Probably fixed, but more testing is required.

    Quote
    - Auto NR with shutter speed override;
    Not fixed, but if shutter is pressed quickly, NR works correctly.
    Files are updated.


    *

    Offline PhyrePhoX

    • *****
    • 2253
    • make RAW not WAR
      • PhyreWorX
  • Publish
    Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
    « Reply #78 on: 14 / March / 2009, 20:02:31 »
    i'm reading ALOT of reviews about the sx10 lately, and all of these reviews come to the same conclusion: remarkably good camera.
    if i hadnt invested in my slr system, i think i would already own a sx10 by now. what is a good camera + chdk? a VERY good camera.
    great job, ewavr, and all those who contributed.

    *

    Offline fe50

    • ******
    • 3034
    • IXUS50 & 860, SX10 Star WARs-Star RAWs
      • fe50
  • Publish
    Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
    « Reply #79 on: 14 / March / 2009, 21:16:36 »

     

    Related Topics