the sx10 porting thread - page 5 - General Discussion and Assistance - CHDK Forum  
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 62   Go Down

the sx10 porting thread

  • 613 Replies
  • 330632 Views
*

Offline gsbergman

  • ***
  • 164
Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #40 on: 28 / February / 2009, 15:11:58 »
Advertisements
Actually, right now all I need is the ability to run scripts and I'd be happy.
Logged
*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14079
Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #41 on: 28 / February / 2009, 15:41:27 »
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
*

Offline gsbergman

  • ***
  • 164
Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #42 on: 28 / February / 2009, 16:21:48 »
Sorry, I was not trying to commercialize CHDK or violate GPL licensing. My misunderstanding.
« Last Edit: 28 / February / 2009, 16:27:54 by gsbergman »
Logged
*

Offline LukeSkaff

  • *
  • 30
Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #43 on: 01 / March / 2009, 00:30:13 »
I think it is a great idea and would donate too since I own a SX10.  The problem is CHDK is really just a few developers scattered around the world and there is no central organization.  The donations could be given to anyone who successfully completes a port but this also raises a whole host of other issues because no developer currently owns a SX10, etc.
Logged
*

Offline galocza

  • *
  • 35
Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #44 on: 01 / March / 2009, 02:48:27 »
« Last Edit: 01 / March / 2009, 02:50:02 by galocza »
Logged
*

Offline Skedoozy

  • *
  • 13
Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #45 on: 04 / March / 2009, 17:03:02 »
This thread makes me sad. :( I'll keep hope alive that one day it will happen!
Logged
*

Offline ewavr

  • ****
  • 1057
  • A710IS
Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #46 on: 11 / March / 2009, 08:23:38 »
Porting started for 1.01A.
For developers - current sources - http://ewavr.nm.ru/chdk/for_test/sx10.zip
Not usable yet for practical use.
« Last Edit: 11 / March / 2009, 14:51:10 by ewavr »
Logged
*

Offline Skedoozy

  • *
  • 13
Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #47 on: 11 / March / 2009, 12:07:34 »
HOPE!
Logged
*

Offline fe50

  • ******
  • 3147
  • IXUS50 & 860, SX10 Star WARs-Star RAWs
    • fe50
Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #48 on: 11 / March / 2009, 18:48:55 »
Quote from: ewavr on 11 / March / 2009, 08:23:38
Porting started for 1.01A.
For developers - current sources - http://ewavr.nm.ru/chdk/for_test/sx10.zip
Not usable yet for practical use.

 :xmas - great news !

I'm a bit busy atm, so i've just compiled (patched #716, gcc 3.4) it & did some short tests...wow, an absolutely fine "first shoot" !

Keyboard, menu, OSD, alternative Shortcut (flash key), TV bracketing, scripting, Flashlight, Zebra, Histo, USB remote (PC test)
...works great (and IS already usable for practical use) !!!
I hope i can do more testing tomorrow.

THX ewavr, damned good work !   ... btw - do you own a SX10 now ?

*EDIT:
  DNG works fine (with badpixel.lua; <5000 badpixels on my cam), saving time ~ 3,5 seconds,
  good colors, EXIF data is ok, opens with PS3, PS4, XNView, UFRAW/GIMP, Picasa, Pain.NET...
 
  Also tested (short): Games, Filebrowser, Textfile reader; llibtst.lua runs without errors (logfile attached)

  I've attached the compiled binaries (the "complete" package) for the other SX10 1.01A users...
« Last Edit: 11 / March / 2009, 19:37:08 by fe50 »
Logged
*

Offline ewavr

  • ****
  • 1057
  • A710IS
Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #49 on: 11 / March / 2009, 20:23:26 »
Quote from: fe50 on 11 / March / 2009, 18:48:55
THX ewavr,
Many thanks to reyalp for his SD990 code.
Quote
btw - do you own a SX10 now ?
No, this camera is too big, heavy and expensive for me. I love my a710  :).

Quote
DNG works fine (with badpixel.lua; <5000 badpixels on my cam), saving time ~ 3,5 seconds,  good colors
 
Color matrix from other camera (s5is?). I see that 'RAW buffer cached' option has no effect in this camera.
Now I see two bugs:
- 'force manual flash' don't work in video (I will look on this later)
- NR works incorrectly in Tv override mode. For example, if camera Tv=1/10s and CHDK Tv=5s, no dark frame will be subtracted (NR is set to 'auto'). I have no idea how to fix it  :(.
Quote
I've attached the compiled binaries
Very many things not done yet.

Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 62   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Related Topics