the sx10 porting thread - page 7 - General Discussion and Assistance - CHDK Forum

the sx10 porting thread

  • 613 Replies
  • 354938 Views
Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #60 on: 12 / March / 2009, 19:07:33 »
Advertisements
Thanks for all of your replies.  I did a lot of research last night after I posted, which I realized I should have done before, and then started checking into what you all have suggested.  It's an understatement to say that there is a lot to digest, especially for a newbie, but I hope I can start hacking away at it soon.  I thank everyone who is already working on this project as I know how time consuming it can be.  Keep up the great work!

Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #61 on: 12 / March / 2009, 20:16:55 »
Thanks ewavr for your work, I own a SX10 1.01B, so I was like, ugh, sooo close when I saw ver. A is being ported, haha.  It's great to see headway on the Digic IV cameras.

*

Offline ewavr

  • ****
  • 1057
  • A710IS
Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #62 on: 12 / March / 2009, 21:51:33 »
SX10 1.01A updated: added wheel support, multipartition support, RAW sum/average for 12-bit RAW (to do: curves and RAW subtract  for 12-bit RAW).
Forget about video bitrate change (no MJPEG inside?).
Binaries + scr: http://ewavr.nm.ru/chdk/for_test/
« Last Edit: 12 / March / 2009, 21:57:13 by ewavr »

Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #63 on: 13 / March / 2009, 00:49:20 »
Like LukeSkaff, I have an SX10 1.01B and am very happy to see things moving forward.  Big thanks and high fives to ewavr and all the other developers who have made CHDK possible.

*

Offline dennisfox74

  • *
  • 18
  • Canon A550, Canon SX10-IS
Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #64 on: 13 / March / 2009, 01:17:10 »
I noticed that there's no "DNG visable under USB" function in the Miscellaneous properties like there is on CHDK for the A550, is that something that's going to be added later on, or dropped from the SX10-IS build? 

Photography is the art, of making a fraction of a second, last forever.

*

Offline whim

  • ******
  • 2046
  • A495/590/620/630 ixus70/115/220/230/300/870 S95
Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #65 on: 13 / March / 2009, 04:41:41 »
@ewavr

Quote
Forget about video bitrate change (no MJPEG inside?)

Looks like Canon switched formats (both container and codec)

Quote
Movie: MOV (Image: H.264; Audio: Linear PCM (Stereo))


wim
« Last Edit: 13 / March / 2009, 04:48:02 by whim »

*

Offline ewavr

  • ****
  • 1057
  • A710IS
Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #66 on: 13 / March / 2009, 05:20:54 »
I noticed that there's no "DNG visable under USB" function in the Miscellaneous properties like there is on CHDK for the A550, is that something that's going to be added later on, or dropped from the SX10-IS build? 

reyalp wrote in sd990 thread:

DNG extension via USB not supported (I didn't see the required pointers anywhere in the dump)

I aslo didn't see the required pointers anywhere in SX10 dump.

Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #67 on: 13 / March / 2009, 05:43:53 »
Do you know the addresses for  'PostLogicalEventForNotPowerType'  and 'RefreshUSBMode' ?


David

*

Offline ewavr

  • ****
  • 1057
  • A710IS
Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #68 on: 13 / March / 2009, 05:49:40 »
Do you know the addresses for  'PostLogicalEventForNotPowerType'  and 'RefreshUSBMode' ?

FF83DDF4 RefreshUSBMode
FF87EC9C PostLogicalEventForNotPowerType

*

Offline dennisfox74

  • *
  • 18
  • Canon A550, Canon SX10-IS
Re: Is CHDK for SX10 possible in the future
« Reply #69 on: 13 / March / 2009, 06:23:17 »
I aslo didn't see the required pointers anywhere in SX10 dump.

Ah, okay then, I'll just have to go get a better card reader.  Thank you.

And thanks for working on this!  I've been looking forward to it! 
Photography is the art, of making a fraction of a second, last forever.

 

Related Topics


SimplePortal © 2008-2014, SimplePortal