the sx10 porting thread

  • 613 Replies
  • 140278 Views
  • Publish
    Re: the sx10 porting thread
    « Reply #560 on: 25 / September / 2009, 22:43:05 »
    Advertisements
    Is there a working intervalometer for the SX10? I tried a lua one and it crashed immediately.

    *

    Offline reyalp

    • ******
    • 9801
  • Publish
    Re: the sx10 porting thread
    « Reply #561 on: 25 / September / 2009, 23:26:57 »
    Is there a working intervalometer for the SX10? I tried a lua one and it crashed immediately.
    It would be helpful if you say exactly which script (preferable with a link to where you got it from).

    If you have "save params" set in the script menu, try turning it off.
    Don't forget what the H stands for.

    *

    Offline OldGit

    • ****
    • 303
  • Publish
    Re: the sx10 porting thread
    « Reply #562 on: 27 / September / 2009, 09:44:05 »
    Hi,
    I'm working on the sx200 port and when I look at the sx10 as a ref I find that core\kbd.c has

    #define ZSTEP_TABLE_SIZE 8
    static int nTxtbl[]={0,11,25,41,64,86,105,128};

    but in platform\sx10\main.c is
    static const struct {
       int zp, fl;
    } fl_tbl[] = {
       {   0,   5000 },
       {  11,   6190 },
       {  41,  12610 },
       {  64,  25240 },
       {  86,  45470 },
       { 105,  65880 },
       { 128, 100000 },
    };
    I thought these should hold the same index values, I am wrong, if so can someone explain please.
    Thanks
    OldGit
    SX200 IS-100C

  • Publish
    Re: the sx10 porting thread
    « Reply #563 on: 05 / October / 2009, 20:45:52 »
    I think OldGit is onto something.

    Any coders out who can check it out?

    Ciao!


  • Publish
    Re: the sx10 porting thread
    « Reply #564 on: 11 / October / 2009, 22:18:46 »
    Hey guys   What has to be done to get 1.00c firmware out of beta?

    Steve
    sx10is eos 50d eos 1Ds Mark II eos 5D Mark II

    *

    Offline reyalp

    • ******
    • 9801
  • Publish
    Re: the sx10 porting thread
    « Reply #565 on: 11 / October / 2009, 22:36:07 »
    Hey guys   What has to be done to get 1.00c firmware out of beta?
    Rename the zip to not have beta in the name ;)

    More seriously: http://chdk.setepontos.com/index.php/topic,2468.msg36127.html#msg36127

    The crash when using "add raw suffix" with bracketing should probably be fixed (by disabling the feature) http://chdk.setepontos.com/index.php/topic,2468.msg36244.html#msg36244

    I've been procrastinating this until I find out if other DryOS cameras have the same problem. Anyone ?

    If anyone wants to dig back through the thread and find any other outstanding issue that aren't resolved, please feel free.

    Don't forget what the H stands for.

  • Publish
    Re: the sx10 porting thread
    « Reply #566 on: 11 / October / 2009, 22:51:36 »
    Thanks Reyalp  What is the need for "add raw suffix" with bracketing?


    Steve
    « Last Edit: 11 / October / 2009, 23:06:52 by tool46 »
    sx10is eos 50d eos 1Ds Mark II eos 5D Mark II

    *

    Offline an0n

    • ***
    • 152
  • Publish
    Re: the sx10 porting thread
    « Reply #567 on: 11 / October / 2009, 23:32:22 »

    I've been procrastinating this until I find out if other DryOS cameras have the same problem. Anyone ?

    A720IS, build 0.9.8, 766.   - 3 shots +/- Tv Custom Timer.
    Camera did not crash shooting RAW, with or without DNG, with or without DNG file extension,
    with "Add RAW suffix" enabled. Files were named "CRW_xxxx_01.DNG" "CRW_xxxx_01.CRW" .
    Are they supposed to have "RAW" as suffix?
    hth.
    A720IS.


    *

    Offline reyalp

    • ******
    • 9801
  • Publish
    Re: the sx10 porting thread
    « Reply #568 on: 11 / October / 2009, 23:40:15 »
    Camera did not crash shooting RAW, with or without DNG, with or without DNG file extension,
    with "Add RAW suffix" enabled. Files were named "CRW_xxxx_01.DNG" "CRW_xxxx_01.CRW" .
    Are they supposed to have "RAW" as suffix?
    hth.
    No, only the _01 _02 etc.
    Don't forget what the H stands for.

    *

    Offline fe50

    • ******
    • 3033
    • IXUS50 & 860, SX10 Star WARs-Star RAWs
      • fe50
  • Publish
    Re: the sx10 porting thread
    « Reply #569 on: 12 / October / 2009, 08:20:43 »
    Rename the zip to not have beta in the name ;)
    Yes, since there seem to be no differences between the SX10 ports, we should remove the BETA tag from all of them.

    Quote
    The crash when using "add raw suffix" with bracketing should probably be fixed (by disabling the feature) http://chdk.setepontos.com/index.php/topic,2468.msg36244.html#msg36244
    I've been procrastinating this until I find out if other DryOS cameras have the same problem. Anyone ?
    Although i normally don't use this feature, i did some tests with the SX10 1.01a.
    With different settings (DNG on/off, buffer on/off, in JPG dir on/off) it works fine the most time, in P & Tv mode, with Tv (+- 1Ev) bracketing, in continuous mode and also in custom timer mode - the camera crashed only once while testing (around 200 images).

    I guess it's not a general problem on the SX10, rather a timing issue or a conflict with some Canon routines writing to the SD card (e.g. the Canon thumbnail creation), maybe it's also dependent on the card speed (test card was a 8GB class 6 SDHC one)

    I tested also the SD870, ~100 images (M mode, cont. timer & custom timer; Tv +-1Ev bracketing, DNG on/off; 4GB SD card), no crash at all.
    (All test with autostart loading)
    « Last Edit: 12 / October / 2009, 08:22:36 by fe50 »

     

    Related Topics