Noise Comparison A610, A630 and S3IS - page 2 - Creative Uses of CHDK - CHDK Forum

Pages: 1 [2] 3 Go Down

Noise Comparison A610, A630 and S3IS

23 Replies
6299 Views

A630Lover

Re: Noise Comparison A610, A630 and S3IS

« Reply #10 on: 09 / April / 2009, 06:33:41 »

Advertisements

Well, I just installed Topaz, and I must say that i really do not like the results. Certainly, there is less noise...and the image appears globally shaper, but it is full of strange artifacts, and doesn't seem natural at all.

S3 800ISO filtered.jpg (140.77 kB, 600x400 - viewed 88 times.)

800s topaz.jpg (129.94 kB, 615x398 - viewed 87 times.)
Model:Canon PowerShot S3 IS Software Used:Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows Exposure Time:1/13 seconds F Number:F/2.7 Date Taken:2009:03:29 19:36:10 Metering Mode:Pattern Flash Mode:Flash did not fire; compulsory flash mode Focal Length:6 mm Color Space:sRGB

Logged

bugmenot

Re: Noise Comparison A610, A630 and S3IS

« Reply #11 on: 09 / April / 2009, 09:07:55 »

that's because you didin't used the other sliders. That strange artefact is removed using the Smoothness slider. Also play with the sharpen (remove blur) I forgot how it's called. Anyway I will play with it as soon as i go home. Please redo the test using my suggestions and you'll see topaz is superior.

Logged

A630Lover

Re: Noise Comparison A610, A630 and S3IS

« Reply #12 on: 09 / April / 2009, 09:23:59 »

I'll sure do! Thanks!

edit: I fond some comparison between neat image and Topaz. Might be interesting

http://kimletkeman.blogspot.com/2008/12/neat-image-6-versus-topaz-denoise-21.html

« Last Edit: 09 / April / 2009, 09:33:36 by A630Lover »

Logged

A630Lover

Re: Noise Comparison A610, A630 and S3IS

« Reply #13 on: 09 / April / 2009, 14:23:53 »

Hi there! So I'm back with raw samples. I developed all raw using ACR5.2 and all sharpening and noise reduction to 0.

First series, 80 and 100 ISO

A630 80 ISO RAW.jpg (264.37 kB, 800x600 - viewed 73 times.)

S3 80ISO raw.jpg (217.35 kB, 700x500 - viewed 86 times.)

A630 100 ISO RAW.jpg (278.45 kB, 800x600 - viewed 64 times.)

S3 100 ISO RAW.jpg (221.73 kB, 700x500 - viewed 84 times.)
Model:Canon PowerShot S3 IS Software Used:Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows Exposure Time:1/20 seconds F Number:F/2.7 ISO Speed:100 Date Taken:2009:04:09 16:17:21 Metering Mode:Pattern Flash Mode:Flash did not fire; compulsory flash mode Focal Length:6 mm Color Space:Uncalibrated

Logged

A630Lover

Re: Noise Comparison A610, A630 and S3IS

« Reply #14 on: 09 / April / 2009, 14:37:18 »

200 ISO

A630 200 ISO RAW.jpg (319.94 kB, 800x600 - viewed 70 times.)

S3 200 ISO RAW.jpg (274.93 kB, 700x500 - viewed 98 times.)
Model:Canon PowerShot S3 IS Software Used:Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows Exposure Time:1/40 seconds F Number:F/2.7 ISO Speed:200 Date Taken:2009:04:09 16:17:29 Metering Mode:Pattern Flash Mode:Flash did not fire; compulsory flash mode Focal Length:6 mm Color Space:Uncalibrated

Logged

A630Lover

Re: Noise Comparison A610, A630 and S3IS

« Reply #15 on: 09 / April / 2009, 14:38:14 »

400 ISO

A630 400 ISO RAW.jpg (314.96 kB, 800x600 - viewed 75 times.)

S3 400 ISO RAW.jpg (328.18 kB, 700x500 - viewed 71 times.)
Model:Canon PowerShot S3 IS Software Used:Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows Exposure Time:1/60 seconds F Number:F/3 ISO Speed:400 Date Taken:2009:04:09 16:17:36 Metering Mode:Pattern Flash Mode:Flash did not fire; compulsory flash mode Focal Length:6 mm Color Space:Uncalibrated

Logged

A630Lover

Re: Noise Comparison A610, A630 and S3IS

« Reply #16 on: 09 / April / 2009, 14:39:15 »

800 ISO

A630 800 ISO RAW.jpg (491.76 kB, 800x600 - viewed 90 times.)

S3 800 ISO RAW.jpg (424.37 kB, 700x500 - viewed 93 times.)
Model:Canon PowerShot S3 IS Software Used:Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows Exposure Time:1/80 seconds F Number:F/4 ISO Speed:800 Date Taken:2009:04:09 16:17:44 Metering Mode:Pattern Flash Mode:Flash did not fire; compulsory flash mode Focal Length:6 mm Color Space:Uncalibrated

Logged