ZERO POST member PRUNING - Forum related topics (including issues) - CHDK Forum

Poll

Should zero post members (registered until Dec 2008) be pruned out of the board?

Yes
38 (71.7%)
No
15 (28.3%)

Total Members Voted: 51

Voting closed: 30 / May / 2009, 06:42:35

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5   Go Down

ZERO POST member PRUNING

  • 42 Replies
  • 14604 Views
*

Offline acseven

  • *****
  • 656
    • 500px
ZERO POST member PRUNING
« on: 23 / May / 2009, 06:42:36 »
Advertisements
Hi,

Having had a recent scare with the host, because of a cpu overload caused by our board, I have to apply some maintenance operations in order to secure the normal usage (and existance) of the CHDK forum.

Regarding ZERO POST users: to this date these build up to more than 5000 of our 8000+ users, and so I ask the community if they should be eliminated, in order to reduce the database size and increase performace.

My opinion is that these records should be deleted, as the board has guest view access, and if someone wants to be a member then they should participate.

The poll will run for 7 days.

Thank you for reading
admin
« Last Edit: 23 / May / 2009, 12:15:50 by acseven »
Logged
*

Offline yvesson

  • ***
  • 209
  • A540 SX10IS
    • poll about some pics (not much serious) ^^
Re: ZERO POST member PRUNING
« Reply #1 on: 23 / May / 2009, 07:01:52 »
Hej,
Can you download the attached files without being logged in ? For example scripts and such ? Would be the only reason imo allowing 0-post users.
Logged
*

Offline PhyrePhoX

  • *****
  • 2254
  • make RAW not WAR
    • PhyreWorX
Re: ZERO POST member PRUNING
« Reply #2 on: 23 / May / 2009, 07:17:55 »
i'm with yvesson on this one.
Logged
*

Offline dzsemx

  • ****
  • 302
  • [SX40HS][A650][A630]
Re: ZERO POST member PRUNING
« Reply #3 on: 23 / May / 2009, 07:27:23 »
you should eliminate users that has not been logged in for 2-3 months...
Logged
*

Offline PhyrePhoX

  • *****
  • 2254
  • make RAW not WAR
    • PhyreWorX
Re: ZERO POST member PRUNING
« Reply #4 on: 23 / May / 2009, 07:33:04 »
you can also write a mass-mail to all of those 0 post users, informing them that their account is about to be deleted.
Logged
*

Offline acseven

  • *****
  • 656
    • 500px
Re: ZERO POST member PRUNING
« Reply #5 on: 23 / May / 2009, 07:49:00 »
Guests can download attachments (for now; I'll have to monitor external traffic for excessive usage).

As for a mass-mail, I was thinking of that but I don't actually think it's worth it, as I'll be checking for the last login date before deletion (and maintain whomever had logged in the last 90 days or so).
Logged
*

Offline fe50

  • ******
  • 3139
  • IXUS50 & 860, SX10 Star WARs-Star RAWs
    • fe50
Re: ZERO POST member PRUNING
« Reply #6 on: 23 / May / 2009, 07:49:55 »
..voted for YES; i propose to terminate zero post users not logged in for about 3 or 4 weeks.
Logged
*

Offline yvesson

  • ***
  • 209
  • A540 SX10IS
    • poll about some pics (not much serious) ^^
Re: ZERO POST member PRUNING
« Reply #7 on: 23 / May / 2009, 07:52:36 »
Quote from: acseven on 23 / May / 2009, 07:49:00
Guests can download attachments (for now; I'll have to monitor external traffic for excessive usage).

Hej,
Okej, I vote yes then. Maybe the most popular files should be hosted at another place and have just a link in the posts.
Logged
*

Offline PhyrePhoX

  • *****
  • 2254
  • make RAW not WAR
    • PhyreWorX
Re: ZERO POST member PRUNING
« Reply #8 on: 23 / May / 2009, 08:11:46 »
this makes them lost very fast ;)
Logged
*

databoy

Re: ZERO POST member PRUNING
« Reply #9 on: 23 / May / 2009, 09:27:05 »
95% of the time I do not log in.
If the database is too big and consuming space and CPU, delete.
A person can re-register if posting is important.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Related Topics