Interval-o-meter power requirements.
The test: daylapse script, 60s interval, Af refocus, AF lock focus and MF modes compared. Cam set to display idle in 10s. Note that daylapse actually wakes up the cam for a preparation time before shoot, prepares then waits for shoot time, then shoot -- other interval scripts usually wakeup, prepare and shoot as soon as possible. So these results may be considered a little high.
I think I've done the math right for energy cost in mWH per shot:
cam_active_s * mean_active_mW / 3600 to get total shot_energy mWH, then subtract:
cam_active_s * idle_mW / 3600 to get net shot_energy mWH
which could have been:
cam_active_s * (mean_active_mW - idle_mW) / 3600
if I'd thought of that sooner
Results:
AF mode refocus: 353mW plus 4.96mWH / shot
AF lock focus: 358mW plus 3.88mWH / shot
MF mode: 359mW plus 7.52mWH / shot
Also on bottom of
http://bugsplatter.id.au/chdk/a590-power-2.html page if you want to see the pictures and check how the measurements were taken between the cursors.
Notes:
MF mode takes more energy because the cam needs time to restore MF mode after waking up, as well as the increased power while active.
AF refocus also takes extra time to refocus, test was done in a dim room, it's a cloudy day today. Bright light focusing would be quicker.
Both AF refocus and MF modes turned on the AF assist LED.
The daylapse script uses 'shoot_half' to wake cam from idle, and is not yet fully optimised for lowest power consumption. I'm happy to test other scripts if they're easy to use and work on a590-101b or a470-101b -- even a580-101b if you have a chdk port requires testing
.
View from the cam.