SX200is Porting - page 45 - DryOS Development - CHDK Forum
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 ... 111   Go Down

SX200is Porting

  • 1105 Replies
  • 575965 Views
*

Offline OldGit

  • ****
  • 303
Re: SX200is Porting
« Reply #440 on: 25 / September / 2009, 01:06:32 »
Advertisements
Good morning Smartkiller,
I don't know the answer, it will take as long as it takes I think.
@reyalp has a lot of calls on his time, we will have to be patient.

We will need to be careful when the source gets to the trunk, I see that the wiki bug list has changed.
I don't understand how bugs have been fixed or changed when we have not changed the source (dev-svn).

I'm just content for now to wait and see what happens.
When we go to the trunk, I will download a new source copy and start work on the bugs.
Maybe we can list who will take care of each bug, what do you think ?.
OldGit
Logged
SX200 IS-100C
*

Offline smartkiller

  • ***
  • 139
Re: SX200is Porting
« Reply #441 on: 25 / September / 2009, 01:23:50 »
Quote from: OldGit on 25 / September / 2009, 01:06:32
Good morning Smartkiller,
I don't know the answer, it will take as long as it takes I think.
@reyalp has a lot of calls on his time, we will have to be patient.

We will need to be careful when the source gets to the trunk, I see that the wiki bug list has changed.
I don't understand how bugs have been fixed or changed when we have not changed the source (dev-svn).

I'm just content for now to wait and see what happens.
When we go to the trunk, I will download a new source copy and start work on the bugs.
Maybe we can list who will take care of each bug, what do you think ?.
OldGit
Good morning OldGit

The best is when the Source is in the Trunk, that we use the Bugtracker.
And the Wiki Bug List must be also Up to Date.

When a Bug or Feature is changed or Fixed then it must be seen on both places.

The Bugfixer highlight her Changes in the Wiki with her Nickname (as same as in the Source)

Priority number one is my opinion, is to the clean Source so that the Port cames fast in the Trunk.

So we have one Source for all Devels.

Let us collect all Bugs and Features and hold the Wiki up to Date until the Source is in the Trunk.

Smartkiller
« Last Edit: 25 / September / 2009, 01:26:17 by smartkiller »
Logged
SX200 IS Firm. 100c
SX1 IS Firm. 201a
*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14128
Re: SX200is Porting
« Reply #442 on: 25 / September / 2009, 01:25:30 »
Quote from: smartkiller on 25 / September / 2009, 00:55:23
When is the Port Ready for the Trunk?
When it's done. Unfortunately what I was given was a mess, and since I'm the poor sucker who's going to have to maintain it, I'm going to clean up or disable the **** I don't like. If you want it sooner, I can disable more ****.

If I hadn't wasted so much time on it already, or was able to communicate better with the porters I'd just throw it back at you guys and say try again.

Don't get me wrong, I appreciate all the work you guys put into it but I'm not very happy with the whole thing right now.
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
*

Offline OldGit

  • ****
  • 303
Re: SX200is Porting
« Reply #443 on: 25 / September / 2009, 01:28:25 »
Smartkiller,
yes I agree with you, we need one source.
But the bug list ?, on the wiki the bug for optical zoom has changed from "use zoom_out" to "not working, how has the source changed ?.
OldGit
Logged
SX200 IS-100C
*

Offline OldGit

  • ****
  • 303
Re: SX200is Porting
« Reply #444 on: 25 / September / 2009, 01:30:50 »
Quote from: reyalp on 25 / September / 2009, 01:25:30
.......  I'm not very happy with the whole thing right now.
Sorry to hear that, is there anything I can do to help ?.
OldGit
Logged
SX200 IS-100C
*

Offline smartkiller

  • ***
  • 139
Re: SX200is Porting
« Reply #445 on: 25 / September / 2009, 01:34:47 »
Quote from: reyalp on 25 / September / 2009, 01:25:30
Quote from: smartkiller on 25 / September / 2009, 00:55:23
When is the Port Ready for the Trunk?
When it's done. Unfortunately what I was given was a mess, and since I'm the poor sucker who's going to have to maintain it, I'm going to clean up or disable the **** I don't like. If you want it sooner, I can disable more ****.

If I hadn't wasted so much time on it already, or was able to communicate better with the porters I'd just throw it back at you guys and say try again.

Don't get me wrong, I appreciate all the work you guys put into it but I'm not very happy with the whole thing right now.

Puhh
Who can translate this for me in German?

That is for my litle English to much.

Smartkiller
Logged
SX200 IS Firm. 100c
SX1 IS Firm. 201a
*

Offline smartkiller

  • ***
  • 139
Re: SX200is Porting
« Reply #446 on: 25 / September / 2009, 01:43:27 »
Quote from: OldGit on 25 / September / 2009, 01:28:25
Smartkiller,
yes I agree with you, we need one source.
But the bug list ?, on the wiki the bug for optical zoom has changed from "use zoom_out" to "not working, how has the source changed ?.
OldGit
With the last changes from Ihar
Code: [Select]
#undef CAM_HAS_ZOOM_LEVER
#define CAM_AF_SCAN_DURING_VIDEO_RECORD 1
the Optical zoom ist not working, with the older Source the Zoom works sporadic with tricks. (Digi Zoom on)
My opinion is that the zoom must work, equal the Zoom is standing by record start. (when it is fixable)

The second thing is to mute the micro by Zoom. (when it is fixable)

Smartkiller
Logged
SX200 IS Firm. 100c
SX1 IS Firm. 201a
*

Offline Haf

  • *
  • 3
Re: SX200is Porting
« Reply #447 on: 25 / September / 2009, 01:46:33 »
Logged
*

Offline OldGit

  • ****
  • 303
Re: SX200is Porting
« Reply #448 on: 25 / September / 2009, 01:47:53 »
Smartkiller,
On the zoom,
The source, in dev-svn does not include ihar's fixes yet, so we still have sporadic zoom.
The mute, I don't know if this is possible, I can't find a "mic on" mic off" function.
If we can find it, can we use a menu option to make it user defined.
Sometimes any sound is better than no sound.
OldGit
Logged
SX200 IS-100C
*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14128
Re: SX200is Porting
« Reply #449 on: 25 / September / 2009, 01:59:49 »
Quote from: OldGit on 25 / September / 2009, 01:30:50
Quote from: reyalp on 25 / September / 2009, 01:25:30
.......  I'm not very happy with the whole thing right now.
Sorry to hear that, is there anything I can do to help ?.
OldGit
Can you confirm that the values of propcase 223 match what's on the wiki ? (this the timer mode) If you can describe how the "custom timer" mode works, that might be helpful too since my camera doesn't have that.
edit: never mind describing, I read the manual.

If someone with one of the other digic III/IV cameras can describe how 102 interacts with the timer setting that would also be helpful.  The wiki says 3 is timers (with 2 apparently not used). Does this mean it is 3 any time any timer mode is selected ?

Please update the wiki to note any differences that apply to your camera http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/Propertycase
« Last Edit: 25 / September / 2009, 02:06:25 by reyalp »
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
Pages: 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 ... 111   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Related Topics


SimplePortal © 2008-2014, SimplePortal