SD960 IS? - page 2 - General Discussion and Assistance - CHDK Forum
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

SD960 IS?

  • 12 Replies
  • 4577 Views
*

Offline RaduP

  • *****
  • 926
Re: SD960 IS?
« Reply #10 on: 06 / October / 2009, 06:02:18 »
Advertisements
Umm, there was no money talk involved, I was merely pointing out that based on the cost of the camera, it would not be financially wise to start working at the port.
Logged
*

Offline whim

  • ******
  • 2046
  • A495/590/620/630 ixus70/115/220/230/300/870 S95
Re: SD960 IS?
« Reply #11 on: 06 / October / 2009, 06:37:51 »
@RaduP

I certainly did not mean to accuse anyone of anything, just wanted to provide some food for thought  ;)
Fully agree with your remark, BTW (reyalp posted something similar a while ago IIRC)

cheers,

wim
Logged
*

Offline HarpoMa

  • ***
  • 218
Re: SD960 IS?
« Reply #12 on: 06 / October / 2009, 09:45:12 »
@whim - Not wanting to argue point 4 because it's very important.  However I will make clear to everyone involved.  If someone provided a camera to me (or the money to buy said camera) it would still be released here.  So no one is buying the port for themselves.  They are enabling the production of a port for general release here.
@RaduP - Can you really think that someone would give you a camera just to dump the FW?
Logged
Canon Models - SD300, SD780, & SX210
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Related Topics


SimplePortal © 2008-2014, SimplePortal