the sx20 porting thread - page 115 - General Discussion and Assistance - CHDK Forum
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 110 111 112 113 114 [115] 116 117 118 119 120 ... 129   Go Down

the sx20 porting thread

  • 1286 Replies
  • 471707 Views
*

Offline vtysh

  • *
  • 12
Re: the sx20 porting thread
« Reply #1140 on: 21 / February / 2011, 10:55:12 »
Advertisements
CHDK-Shell\trunk\trunkXXXX\bin
Logged
*

Offline bdasmith

  • ***
  • 117
Re: the sx20 porting thread
« Reply #1141 on: 21 / February / 2011, 11:15:06 »
thanks vtysh, found them!

now i cannot figure out what blank spaces to remove in the make file (its the main make file for the trunk right?) for 1067.
Logged
sx20is 1.02d
*

Offline NEZtron

  • *
  • 29
Re: the sx20 porting thread
« Reply #1142 on: 21 / February / 2011, 11:26:29 »
Hi

thanks! vtysh now I see.
Let "sx20-102d-120b-0.9.9-1067-full.zip   http://www.megaupload.com/?d=XO0IQB87  " (no games), does not solve the problem. But it is more stable.
Can pass "boot.c" with patch for do test?, for 1.0.2b  thanks!.
« Last Edit: 21 / February / 2011, 11:28:42 by NEZtron »
Logged
Canon SX20 is 1.02b CHDK
*

Offline whim

  • ******
  • 2046
  • A495/590/620/630 ixus70/115/220/230/300/870 S95
Re: the sx20 porting thread
« Reply #1143 on: 21 / February / 2011, 11:27:47 »
Quote
now i cannot figure out what blank spaces to remove in the make file

should not be necessary anymore since v3.06

thanks for reporting,

wim

Logged
*

Offline vtysh

  • *
  • 12
Re: the sx20 porting thread
« Reply #1144 on: 21 / February / 2011, 12:34:32 »
NEZtron: you need to patch main.c not a boot.c
Logged
*

Offline bdasmith

  • ***
  • 117
Re: the sx20 porting thread
« Reply #1145 on: 21 / February / 2011, 12:39:05 »
Quote from: vtysh on 21 / February / 2011, 12:34:32
NEZtron: you need to patch main.c not a boot.c

when putting in the extra code, do i include the + sign??  or do i just put in msleep(1000) or whatever number like this -   msleep(1000);
« Last Edit: 21 / February / 2011, 12:41:11 by bdasmith »
Logged
sx20is 1.02d
*

Offline vtysh

  • *
  • 12
Re: the sx20 porting thread
« Reply #1146 on: 21 / February / 2011, 12:51:28 »
+ determines the lines which had to be added so you don't need to put it
Logged
*

Offline bdasmith

  • ***
  • 117
Re: the sx20 porting thread
« Reply #1147 on: 21 / February / 2011, 13:11:53 »
Quote from: vtysh on 21 / February / 2011, 12:51:28
+ determines the lines which had to be added so you don't need to put it

gotcha!   thanks
Logged
sx20is 1.02d
*

Offline bdasmith

  • ***
  • 117
Re: the sx20 porting thread
« Reply #1148 on: 21 / February / 2011, 13:58:15 »
if the sleep command stops the crash, can it be put elsewhere in the code where it will not break the script abiility

going to experiment a but myself, but if anyone else could look at it for me and think about it would be helpful :)
Logged
sx20is 1.02d
*

Offline NEZtron

  • *
  • 29
Re: the sx20 porting thread
« Reply #1149 on: 21 / February / 2011, 14:44:54 »
hello world

C : CHDK/trunk/trunk1067/core/main.c


between lines 114 to 128 of main.c
----------------------------------------------------------------------
    while((i++<400) && !spytask_can_start) msleep(10);

    started();
    msleep(50);    <-------------------------------------------CHANG THIS FOR  msleep(1000)
    finished();
    drv_self_unhide();

    conf_restore();
    gui_init();

#if CAM_CONSOLE_LOG_ENABLED
    cam_console_init();
#endif
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reference Bernd R in            http://chdk.setepontos.com/index.php?topic=4348.msg60115#msg60115

thanks! vtysh, now understood!  I was dizzy...  :blink:      I move to windows and prove
« Last Edit: 21 / February / 2011, 14:48:27 by NEZtron »
Logged
Canon SX20 is 1.02b CHDK
Pages: 1 ... 110 111 112 113 114 [115] 116 117 118 119 120 ... 129   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Related Topics
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal