supplierdeeply

Poll

CHDK & it's Fame

Hire a PR dude, create adverts & merchandise - CHDK shall be known everywhere
2 (2%)
let "big" magazines/websites get to know chdk (e.g. by email)
11 (10.9%)
spam fora, blogs, comments
3 (3%)
Word of mouth!
26 (25.7%)
i like my small community, let's keep it clean and simple
59 (58.4%)

Total Members Voted: 89

CHDK in the media

  • 159 Replies
  • 51620 Views
*

Offline GrAnd

  • ****
  • 916
  • [A610, S3IS]
    • CHDK
  • Publish
    Re: CHDK in the media
    « Reply #40 on: 08 / April / 2008, 05:51:46 »
    Advertisements
    by the way, what about adding chdk to Ohloh, the open source network ?

    He-he... CHDK - Ohloh :D
    CHDK Developer.

    *

    Offline PhyrePhoX

    • *****
    • 2253
    • make RAW not WAR
      • PhyreWorX
  • Publish
    Re: CHDK in the media
    « Reply #41 on: 08 / April / 2008, 06:07:15 »
    hehe, you're fast. wanted to add chdk a few days ago, but figured it should be one of the core devs to do that :)
    i'm curious on how the outcome of the ohloh analysis will be :)

  • Publish
    Re: CHDK in the media
    « Reply #42 on: 08 / April / 2008, 17:49:08 »
    Ohloh - As a project manager, looking at the Ohloh site I found the estimated project cost for CHDK interesting.  Are these calculated on CHDK codebase, GrAnd?
    27 person years for CHDK compared with Apache http server 54 person years (and  Linux kernel 3219 person years :blink:).
    Just some rough estimate but give anyway some feeling for the combined efforts of this project :).
    Ooops - saw that you already covered this in the other Ohloh tread. Anyway - nice!
    « Last Edit: 08 / April / 2008, 18:14:33 by fingalo »

  • Publish
    Re: CHDK in the media
    « Reply #43 on: 09 / April / 2008, 01:23:52 »
    Deleted
    « Last Edit: 22 / April / 2008, 11:43:29 by Barney Fife »
    [acseven/admin commented out: please refrain from more direct offensive language to any user. FW complaints to me] I felt it imperative to withdraw my TOTAL participation. Nobody has my permission, nor the right, to reinstate MY posts. Make-do with my quoted text in others' replies only. Bye


    *

    Offline PhyrePhoX

    • *****
    • 2253
    • make RAW not WAR
      • PhyreWorX
  • Publish
    Re: CHDK in the media
    « Reply #44 on: 10 / April / 2008, 08:40:16 »
    « Last Edit: 14 / April / 2008, 18:43:24 by PhyrePhoX »

    *

    Offline PhyrePhoX

    • *****
    • 2253
    • make RAW not WAR
      • PhyreWorX
  • Publish
    Re: CHDK in the media
    « Reply #45 on: 14 / April / 2008, 18:51:38 »
    Flickr: Discussing CHDK for S5 IS (firmware 1.01b and a) now available! in Canon PowerShot S5  IS
    huuuge thread. this one guy there does all the support, thanks to him we dont have them flood the forum :D
    Quote
    I'm hoping Canon will put in RAW support and a battery indicator when they come out with a firmware update for the S5.
    this one comment really made me chuckle :D
    i really dont get why that guy doesnt redirect the people to the wiki or the forum, instead he writes things like
    Quote
    I think I might put a web site on my server dedicated to the S5 and all of it's additions. With tutorials and videos.
    well okay, i now see sometimes he redirects them. funny :D i guess it's alright, less work to do :D
    lots of posts down there our hero Dataghost even has a word for them :)
    « Last Edit: 14 / April / 2008, 19:06:01 by Barney Fife »

  • Publish
    Re: CHDK in the media
    « Reply #46 on: 14 / April / 2008, 19:06:34 »
    Deleted
    « Last Edit: 22 / April / 2008, 17:53:44 by Barney Fife »
    [acseven/admin commented out: please refrain from more direct offensive language to any user. FW complaints to me] I felt it imperative to withdraw my TOTAL participation. Nobody has my permission, nor the right, to reinstate MY posts. Make-do with my quoted text in others' replies only. Bye

    *

    Offline PhyrePhoX

    • *****
    • 2253
    • make RAW not WAR
      • PhyreWorX
  • Publish
    Re: CHDK in the media
    « Reply #47 on: 14 / April / 2008, 19:13:14 »
     i wouldnt go that far as to call him that. after all, he may be a member of this very forum and knows his stuff - and also knows that flooding this forum will do no good. i dont know the exact saying, but: cut him some slack. :D


  • Publish
    Re: CHDK in the media
    « Reply #48 on: 14 / April / 2008, 19:40:53 »
    Deleted
    « Last Edit: 22 / April / 2008, 17:54:04 by Barney Fife »
    [acseven/admin commented out: please refrain from more direct offensive language to any user. FW complaints to me] I felt it imperative to withdraw my TOTAL participation. Nobody has my permission, nor the right, to reinstate MY posts. Make-do with my quoted text in others' replies only. Bye

    *

    Offline PhyrePhoX

    • *****
    • 2253
    • make RAW not WAR
      • PhyreWorX
  • Publish
    Re: CHDK in the media
    « Reply #49 on: 19 / April / 2008, 07:00:52 »
    http://www.skats.de/hardware/23522-canon-kameras-und-chdk-wie-man-aus.html
    german forum, thread title: How to turn your volkswagen golf into a porsche :D

    BesPhoto Photography: Feature: CHDK: A Shot of Power for Your PowerShot
    this guy actually read the wiki and the forum and has his own "conclusion". nice to read, but nothing we dont know already :D

    The DIS Discussion Forums - DISboards.com
    scattered around this thread some shots made with chdk (starting pretty late into the thread)

    tzywen.com
    blog entry

    Four Camera Hacks You Can Do Today | Gadget Lab from Wired.com
    just a follow-up entry on the already existing one, but fun to read

     

    Related Topics