S95 Porting Thread - page 15 - DryOS Development - CHDK Forum

S95 Porting Thread

  • 1015 Replies
  • 341434 Views
*

Offline waldo

  • ***
  • 238
Re: S95 Porting Thread
« Reply #140 on: 17 / November / 2010, 08:37:16 »
Advertisements
The DrvExp patch is not implemented on the S95 and this may explain that effect.  I'll add that to the list.

Re: S95 Porting Thread
« Reply #141 on: 17 / November / 2010, 08:46:34 »
thanx a lot!

we are in version 3 so far, am I right?

*

Offline waldo

  • ***
  • 238
Re: S95 Porting Thread
« Reply #142 on: 17 / November / 2010, 08:56:48 »

Re: S95 Porting Thread
« Reply #143 on: 18 / November / 2010, 15:35:50 »
I think it won't go lower than 80 ISO and faster than 1/1600... anyone? maybe I'm doing something wrong...

1/10000 looks exactly the same as 1/1600 and lowering the ISO to 10 does nothing...

using last version (4)

it works (it overrides) but it won't exceed normal camera limits (1/1600-15sec, ISO80, etc)...
I really hope this can be solved :(
« Last Edit: 18 / November / 2010, 15:52:40 by Fernando »


Re: S95 Porting Thread
« Reply #144 on: 18 / November / 2010, 15:52:49 »
I think it won't go lower than 80 ISO and faster than 1/2000... anyone? maybe I'm doing something wrong...

1/10000 looks exactly the same as 1/2000 and lowering the ISO to 10 does nothing...

using last version (4)

ISO allways was a problem, I got some strange ISOs with my A710 back in the days, but it is wasn't really working at all. On no cam, as far as I know. Some cams support ISO 50 or even ISO 16 and other settings below 80, but it's "expectable" that ISO doesn't work for the S95.

shutterspeed-override isn't workin for me below 1/1600 either (over 15sec no problems).

further question:
in a manual focusing during video script the following lines have no effect - ideas anyone?
Quote
if is_key "up" then  set_focus 120
if is_key "set" then set_focus 600
if is_key "down" then set_focus 2000

Anyone try the USB Remote function?
« Reply #145 on: 18 / November / 2010, 17:10:36 »
I just found out about CHDK, and have not tried it yet. I am just curious if anyone has tried the USB remote function to trigger a shot on the S95, as described here: http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/USB_Remote_Cable

If so, what is the delay time between the signal and the camera shutter?  Also, how consistent is the timing?

Re: Anyone try the USB Remote function?
« Reply #146 on: 18 / November / 2010, 17:40:46 »
what is the delay time between the signal and the camera shutter?

It is very variable.

Quote
  Also, how consistent is the timing?

Very inconsistent if you trigger on USB going high, very consistent if you trigger on USB going low.

It varies, but photo taken about 20 msec after USB goes low with a repeatability of typically 1/5000 sec.


David

Re: S95 Porting Thread
« Reply #147 on: 19 / November / 2010, 00:18:27 »
> photo taken about 20 msec after USB goes low with a repeatability of typically 1/5000 sec.
Wow! better than I expected. Thanks for the info.


Re: S95 Porting Thread
« Reply #148 on: 19 / November / 2010, 04:03:42 »
I am still alive


and your name lives on in the SDM source code !


Hi Microfunguy, my name lives in the SDM source code? Thanks, but what I did to get this honor?
2 x IXUS 860IS 100c
2 x Powershot S110 103a

Re: S95 Porting Thread
« Reply #149 on: 19 / November / 2010, 12:08:58 »
what I did to get this honor?

"Mr_Burns fix for G9 and other cameras that failed to autostart script"


 

Related Topics


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal