Chdk for SX130 IS ? - page 27 - CHDK Releases - CHDK Forum  
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 ... 110   Go Down

Chdk for SX130 IS ?

  • 1095 Replies
  • 407661 Views
*

Offline quid

  • **
  • 67
  • SX130IS
Re: Chdk for SX130 IS ?
« Reply #260 on: 19 / February / 2011, 06:18:53 »
Advertisements
@outslider: Did you manage to test build from reply #225?
Logged
*

Offline ali555

  • *
  • 19
Re: Chdk for SX130 IS ?
« Reply #261 on: 19 / February / 2011, 09:06:46 »
@outslider Thanks, i'll give that a go, glad it isn't just me :) Although I previously used CHDK on my Canon Powershot 710IS and CRW worked fine? is this just a problem with later sensors?
Logged
*

Offline outslider

  • *****
  • 762
Re: Chdk for SX130 IS ?
« Reply #262 on: 19 / February / 2011, 09:28:38 »
@qoud
Yes, forgive me I didn' answer, I have used it and it works perfectly! Thx!

@ali555
I said - I believe:D I'm not sure, I've found this information somewhere before and I just started to use dng. Since it works, I don't care about crw;)
Logged
if (2*b || !2*b) {
    cout<<question
}

Compile error: poor Yorick
*

Offline ali555

  • *
  • 19
Re: Chdk for SX130 IS ?
« Reply #263 on: 19 / February / 2011, 09:58:44 »
@outslider :D very pragmatic! Well at the end of the day, you've converted a crippled camera to something that is usable :) So a huge thank you to all who've made that transition :)
Logged
*

Offline outslider

  • *****
  • 762
Re: Chdk for SX130 IS ?
« Reply #264 on: 19 / February / 2011, 10:03:35 »
@ali555
No, no, no, I've done almost nothing. All 'thank you' should be send to quid and others who made the CHDK aviable for SX130 users;p
« Last Edit: 19 / February / 2011, 10:05:09 by outslider »
Logged
if (2*b || !2*b) {
    cout<<question
}

Compile error: poor Yorick
*

Offline ali555

  • *
  • 19
Re: Chdk for SX130 IS ?
« Reply #265 on: 19 / February / 2011, 10:29:22 »
That works perfectly, does anyone have any rough numbers on their number of bad pixels? I just wonder given the fact that I have dropped my camera in a river previously :) (Yes fully submerged, continued to take photos after with a waterlogged lens, then lens electronics when haywire and I believe CCD was flooded with water also. It's all fine now though :D ) I had 1500 bad pixels
Logged
*

Offline ali555

  • *
  • 19
Re: Chdk for SX130 IS ?
« Reply #266 on: 19 / February / 2011, 10:30:56 »
Hence why I said all :p I wasn't going to mention anyone in particular in the hope of not offending anyone :) But quid certainly appears to have done the majority :)
Logged
*

Offline SX130user

  • *
  • 21
Re: Chdk for SX130 IS ?
« Reply #267 on: 19 / February / 2011, 20:07:17 »
look guys this picture taken this weekend with my SX130IS DNG CHDK on, it is easier to handle now.
the photo is of a parrot. :
 :D






so far can not find bugs in the last version..


P.S: I open my dng files with Picasa 3.
« Last Edit: 19 / February / 2011, 20:15:56 by SX130user »
Logged
*

Pilda

Re: Chdk for SX130 IS ?
« Reply #268 on: 20 / February / 2011, 02:57:29 »
Hi guys,
when I take a photo and use the minimal focal length, I get a photo which is very deformed in DNG format. The same photo is OK in JPG. Is it normal? I believe it is but I wonder how the camera works because if I reduce the deformation, then I have to crop the image and the image is smaller then. If the camera does the same, it has also to resize the image to 4000x3000px then.
« Last Edit: 20 / February / 2011, 07:01:13 by Pilda »
Logged
*

Offline Anton

  • *
  • 13
Re: Chdk for SX130 IS ?
« Reply #269 on: 20 / February / 2011, 05:11:13 »
@Pilda
It's normal. It's the same theme as if you work with small size of sensor.
It's much cheaper to eliminate faults by built in computer unlike better ((optical = lenses) or sensor) Hardware.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 ... 110   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Related Topics