A2200 IS porting thread - page 21 - DryOS Development - CHDK Forum  

A2200 IS porting thread

  • 514 Replies
  • 97582 Views
Re: A2200 IS porting thread
« Reply #200 on: 21 / January / 2012, 16:31:10 »
Advertisements
ok, sorry it still crashes, here is the source anyway?

Did it seem to help in anyway at all with anything?

And as far as what I fixed to make mine stop crashing with ptp enabled was that I cant recall the exact issue, just once I fixed all my addreses in my stubs_entry.2 and my lib.c I then noticed it was working .

NOTE: I pulled the primary.bin from the zip to get file size small enough to post, obviously you already have it anyway. 8]

Thank you! It behaves exactly the same, with the difference that now the menus have icons. Well, any improvement is welcomed!

Re: A2200 IS porting thread
« Reply #201 on: 21 / January / 2012, 16:42:20 »
Cool how much alike our cams obviously are.

I see on yours, you were able to use the hook raw address right from dump.

On mine, the only way I could get it perfect was to use the dump address as starting point and adjust the address little by little till the purple image was shifted out of the image leaving me with a normal image.

Took lots of back and forth to cam to fine tune it but works perfect and raw is great now.

I went from 0x4207DB20 to 0x42075144

Sorry I could not fix your main issue though 8[

Re: A2200 IS porting thread
« Reply #202 on: 21 / January / 2012, 18:24:10 »
ok, sorry it still crashes, here is the source anyway?

Did it seem to help in anyway at all with anything?

And as far as what I fixed to make mine stop crashing with ptp enabled was that I cant recall the exact issue, just once I fixed all my addreses in my stubs_entry.2 and my lib.c I then noticed it was working .

NOTE: I pulled the primary.bin from the zip to get file size small enough to post, obviously you already have it anyway. 8]

Thank you! It behaves exactly the same, with the difference that now the menus have icons. Well, any improvement is welcomed!
Maybe give this one a try too, cant hurt.

Re: A2200 IS porting thread
« Reply #203 on: 21 / January / 2012, 18:48:01 »
Maybe give this one a try too, cant hurt.

Still crashes when trying to take a picture with lua over ptp.


Re: A2200 IS porting thread
« Reply #204 on: 21 / January / 2012, 19:01:30 »
Maybe give this one a try too, cant hurt.

Still crashes when trying to take a picture with lua over ptp.
Ok, then its prob address conflict like you thought, at least it didnt hurt to try.

Re: A2200 IS porting thread
« Reply #205 on: 21 / January / 2012, 19:04:40 »
Ok, then its prob address conflict like you thought, at least it didnt hurt to try.

True, thanks for trying!

Re: A2200 IS porting thread
« Reply #206 on: 23 / January / 2012, 08:27:12 »
Excuse me, what about CDHK to 1.00 d? Which version is needed? Could u give me a link? I didn't understand there is a work version for 1.00 d?

Re: A2200 IS porting thread
« Reply #207 on: 23 / January / 2012, 09:02:43 »
Excuse me, what about CDHK to 1.00 d? Which version is needed? Could u give me a link? I didn't understand there is a work version for 1.00 d?

Check the previous post here for the 1.00D port.


Re: A2200 IS porting thread
« Reply #208 on: 23 / January / 2012, 09:53:48 »
Excuse me, what about CDHK to 1.00 d? Which version is needed? Could u give me a link? I didn't understand there is a work version for 1.00 d?

Check the previous post here for the 1.00D port.
Thanks :)

Re: A2200 IS porting thread
« Reply #209 on: 23 / January / 2012, 12:03:57 »
In order to avoid asking too many questions, can someone explain the porting process? I have gotten the 1.00D port with a lot of crashes. Being this is new to me, I do not know if I am making mistakes, or if this is a work in process in regards to fixing problems along the way. Lastly, is it trial and error to see what functions are compatible with the A2200, or is this fixed along the way? Thank you for your patients with my noob questions.

 

Related Topics