ELPH300HS aka IXUS220HS - Porting Thread - page 83 - DryOS Development

nafraf

1308

Re: ELPH300HS aka IXUS220HS - Porting Thread

« Reply #820 on: 02 / June / 2013, 18:49:36 »

Advertisements

Quote from: johnoshea on 02 / June / 2013, 17:51:40

Has anyone created a Lens Profile to use in Lightroom/Photoshop? I searched the Adobe Lens Profile Downloader tool but none were available there.

msl collected some camera and lenses profiles: Adobe camera & lens profiles

Logged

johnoshea

3

Re: ELPH300HS aka IXUS220HS - Porting Thread

« Reply #821 on: 02 / June / 2013, 19:06:04 »

thanks for the quick reply.

i also found that user: rau89 posted a lens profile to this thread earlier: http://chdk.setepontos.com/index.php?topic=6341.msg84311;topicseen#msg84311

i'll try both of them out and see which works better.

another question:
my main reason for getting CHDK was to improve image quality taking pictures in Raw and processing them using Lightroom---do you guys note any difference? or is Canon's default jpeg processing good enough?

Thanks

Logged

waterwingz

12140

Re: ELPH300HS aka IXUS220HS - Porting Thread

« Reply #822 on: 02 / June / 2013, 19:35:56 »

Quote from: johnoshea on 02 / June / 2013, 19:06:04

my main reason for getting CHDK was to improve image quality taking pictures in Raw and processing them using Lightroom---do you guys note any difference? or is Canon's default jpeg processing good enough?

This has been the subject of much debate on this forum. To be blunt, Canon's jpg processing is usually pretty darn good. Still, a RAW image gives people a chance to optimize images to suit themselves. It just seems to me like a lot of work for not a lot of return compared to Canon JPG - IMHO.

Logged

Ported : A1200 SD940 G10 Powershot N G16

rkomar

98

Re: ELPH300HS aka IXUS220HS - Porting Thread

« Reply #823 on: 02 / June / 2013, 20:25:36 »

With my A4000, the barrel distortion correction isn't perfect, and the white balance can be off by quite a bit. I also intend to use it for digitizing books, and JPEGs are not optimal for that. So, RAW is the safe option, though much more work.

« Last Edit: 02 / June / 2013, 20:58:42 by rkomar »

Logged

johnoshea

3

Re: ELPH300HS aka IXUS220HS - Porting Thread

« Reply #824 on: 02 / June / 2013, 21:40:23 »

Quote from: waterwingz on 02 / June / 2013, 19:35:56

Quote from: johnoshea on 02 / June / 2013, 19:06:04
my main reason for getting CHDK was to improve image quality taking pictures in Raw and processing them using Lightroom---do you guys note any difference? or is Canon's default jpeg processing good enough?
This has been the subject of much debate on this forum. To be blunt, Canon's jpg processing is usually pretty darn good. Still, a RAW image gives people a chance to optimize images to suit themselves. It just seems to me like a lot of work for not a lot of return compared to Canon JPG - IMHO.

thanks for the reply. thats what i figured also. however, the nerd in me still would like to give it a shot and see for myself. i am hoping that through this process, even if i end up reverting back to jpeg for simplicity sake, that i will get to learn a new software (lightroom) which i might end up using for my jpeg editing, and hopefully my overall photography will improve. i'm not a pro at all, just an average guy interested in taking better pictures. at some point, i'd also like to take some timelapse and try out bracketing/HDR.

cheers

Logged

waterwingz

12140

Re: ELPH300HS aka IXUS220HS - Porting Thread

« Reply #825 on: 02 / June / 2013, 21:47:11 »

Quote from: johnoshea on 02 / June / 2013, 21:40:23

thanks for the reply. thats what i figured also. however, the nerd in me still would like to give it a shot and see for myself. i am hoping that through this process, even if i end up reverting back to jpeg for simplicity sake, that i will get to learn a new software (lightroom) which i might end up using for my jpeg editing, and hopefully my overall photography will improve. i'm not a pro at all, just an average guy interested in taking better pictures. at some point, i'd also like to take some timelapse and try out bracketing/HDR.

Playing with RAW/DNG to see what you can do is what CHDK is all about. Especially if you are willing to take the time to experiment and learn. And you will get different effects than the default jpgs - whether they are better or not is "in the eye of the beholder".

Timelapse, HDR, 3D, USB remote, super high speed, very low speed, and Motion Detect (lightening or wildlife) fit into the fun experimental category too.

Good to see you have the right attitude about it all.

Logged

Ported : A1200 SD940 G10 Powershot N G16

kr12

5

Re: ELPH300HS aka IXUS220HS - Porting Thread

« Reply #826 on: 17 / June / 2013, 04:31:06 »

How camera switch "auto" affect to CHDK function?

How to set continues mode and fast burst mode by script?

Logged

fm

1

Re: ELPH300HS aka IXUS220HS - Porting Thread

« Reply #827 on: 26 / June / 2013, 18:05:29 »

Hello!

I have just tested CHDK (1.1) on my IXUS 220 HS and there is one little but annoying bug: when I power it on with the "play" button, it does start in shooting mode, and not playback mode (with the lens opening).

François.

Logged

zcream

94

Re: ELPH300HS aka IXUS220HS - Porting Thread

« Reply #828 on: 06 / October / 2013, 21:33:39 »

Can I confirm that there is no exposure lock in video even with CHDK ?

Logged

CHDK used for a Bullet-time sequence
Welcome to mishra.tv productions

mojo43

24

Re: ELPH300HS aka IXUS220HS - Porting Thread

« Reply #829 on: 15 / January / 2014, 12:44:09 »

Has anyone tried the lock exposure script written here for video yet??

http://chdk.setepontos.com/index.php?topic=5295.100

Logged