The 'stable' branch is https://tools.assembla.com/svn/chdk/branches/release-1_0, version number is 1.0.0-<svnrev>The 'unstable' branch will be the current trunk, version number is 1.1.0-<svnrev> for now.
* Documentation: We should try to keep documentation for the current stable release as complete as possible. We should also try to document new functionality as we write it. Not sure the best way to do this, but at a minimum try to tag things as in 1.0 or in 1.1. At the moment, we have a lot of "as of build NNNN", with stable versions we should be able to just refer to the release.
The documentation part worries me and will need work. I'll keep trying to do my part but remember that this is a project where people still want to use "allbest build" based on reading wiki obsolete pages and probably some judgement call about the meaning behind the name.
My personal feeling is that we should delete/rewrite stuff that's really obsolete. The history is still kept in the wiki. All the references to allbest, mx3, grand builds in end user documentation should just go away. End users don't care if some feature was available in some side branch 3 years ago, it just makes things more confusing.I know there is a desire to keep credit for the early developers, but I don't think keeping references to a of obsolete builds is the way to do it.
BTW - what do you think about removing uBASIC from new experimental release? Do we really have to have two languages? See also: http://chdk.setepontos.com/index.php?topic=7319
Started by blufade
General Discussion and Assistance
Started by Reverb
Started by RaduP
« 1 2 3 »
Started by Fairbanks
Started by kylefoley76