SX280 / 275 / 270 porting - page 37 - DryOS Development - CHDK Forum

SX280 / 275 / 270 porting

  • 363 Replies
  • 176160 Views
*

Offline srsa_4c

  • ******
  • 4411
Re: SX280 / 275 / 270 porting
« Reply #360 on: 18 / April / 2021, 14:01:25 »
Advertisements
I tested the SX280 today with the latest stable German CHDK build, CHDK_DE_sx280hs-102b-1.5.1-5835. I thought this included commit 5816 with the GPS data in the DNGs, but the DNGs still don't have the GPS data while the corresponding JPGs have them. Do I have to wait for a later build for this to work?
At the moment, the changes are only present in the "unstable" development version (1.6). I'll consider backporting the DNG fix.

edit:
I added the DNG fix to the 1.5 branch in r5841.
« Last Edit: 18 / April / 2021, 14:22:06 by srsa_4c »

*

Offline Vydra

  • *
  • 10
Re: SX280 / 275 / 270 porting
« Reply #361 on: 18 / April / 2021, 16:00:22 »
At the moment, the changes are only present in the "unstable" development version (1.6). I'll consider backporting the DNG fix.

edit:
I added the DNG fix to the 1.5 branch in r5841.

I see. Thank you for the backport, I guess that'll land in a 1.5.1 build in a month or so.

Will the other addition (new URL for AGPS) eventually be added to the 1.5 branch as well, or do I have to switch to the 1.6 branch for that? Looking around a bit I saw that the 1.5 branch took about 5 years to become the stable branch at the end of 2020. I didn't really want to run the "unstable" version, but as it might take 1.6 several years to become the stable branch, I'll consider it. How unstable is the "unstable" branch actually? Can I expect frequent crashes or malfunctions? Sorry for all those basic questions, but I'm still rather new to CHDK.

*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 13231
Re: SX280 / 275 / 270 porting
« Reply #362 on: 18 / April / 2021, 16:07:28 »
I see. Thank you for the backport, I guess that'll land in a 1.5.1 build in a month or so.
No, the autobuild should update within an hour of a commit or so.

Quote
I didn't really want to run the "unstable" version, but as it might take 1.6 several years to become the stable branch, I'll consider it. How unstable is the "unstable" branch actually? Can I expect frequent crashes or malfunctions? Sorry for all those basic questions, but I'm still rather new to CHDK.
At the moment, there is very little in the 1.6 branch that is different from 1.5, so current 1.6 builds should be pretty much as stable / safe (or otherwise) as 1.5.

I would probably not favor backporting the URL override.
Don't forget what the H stands for.

*

Offline Vydra

  • *
  • 10
Re: SX280 / 275 / 270 porting
« Reply #363 on: 19 / April / 2021, 13:57:44 »
No, the autobuild should update within an hour of a commit or so.


Oh, very nice. For some reason I thought this was updated once a month, but obviously I got that wrong.

Quote
At the moment, there is very little in the 1.6 branch that is different from 1.5, so current 1.6 builds should be pretty much as stable / safe (or otherwise) as 1.5.

Thank you, that is a statement I appreciate. I'll try the 1.6 branch then.


 

Related Topics