CHDK PTP multiple instances - page 15 - General Discussion and Assistance - CHDK Forum
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19   Go Down

CHDK PTP multiple instances

  • 180 Replies
  • 73390 Views
*

Offline andrew.stephens.754365

  • ****
  • 461
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #140 on: 18 / December / 2013, 14:32:51 »
Advertisements
Quote from: msl on 18 / December / 2013, 13:22:20
Da bewegst du eher einen störischen Esel.  ;)

my googletranslate gives:

"As you move more störischen a donkey."

What is "störischen"?

On second thoughts, please don't answer that :-)

Please also forget the bit after the first "[" in my line above:

"on earth peace, good will toward men[apart from those in the NSA and some others]"

If I thought it was the square brackets had started this i'd start using () [or maybe {}]

I can re-open the poll if anyone thinks it'd be useful?

     
Logged
*

Offline Microfunguy

  • ****
  • 4037
    • StereoData Maker
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #141 on: 18 / December / 2013, 14:49:50 »
Quote from: andrew.stephens.754365 on 18 / December / 2013, 14:32:51
What is "störischen"?

OK, I think I have figured it out :-

"It is easier to move a stubborn donkey"

A good days work, I shall now have my well-deserved gourmet dinner  .... no wurtz for me  :)
Logged
*

Offline msl

  • *****
  • 1280
  • A720 IS, SX220 HS 1.01a
    • CHDK-DE links
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #142 on: 18 / December / 2013, 15:55:51 »
Quote from: Microfunguy on 18 / December / 2013, 14:18:29
I will email you again .

How gracious ... The hero is back again. ::)

No time for publishing of a little bit source code but time for meaningless translations. ;)
Logged
CHDK-DE:  CHDK-DE links
*

Offline Karmaschinken

  • ***
  • 198
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #143 on: 18 / December / 2013, 16:39:55 »
Quote from: Microfunguy on 18 / December / 2013, 14:18:29
Quote from: Karmaschinken on 18 / December / 2013, 13:32:30
David stated here he regards the code to be GPL. It is based on the work of others. I can't believe he doesn't speak the truth here in public.

Absolutely correct
I could comment further on that but frankly cannot be bothered.

As mentioned in the last email (that you did get) I previously sent the code twice and you say you did not receive it.

It is probably lurking on your system somewhere.

I will email you again .

David

Thanks a lot, I appreciate it very much. I sent you a mail with five other mail adresses too, so if you don't mind please CC it to these too. I can't imagine all my mail account fail. However I am very keen to have a look into the code! :-)

Why not post it here, as I found out some more people are interested in that!? Have a nice time and thanks! Martin...
Logged
*

Offline Karmaschinken

  • ***
  • 198
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #144 on: 18 / December / 2013, 16:42:34 »
Okay, thanks a lot, I got it. Now I have something to read! :-)
Logged
*

Offline Microfunguy

  • ****
  • 4037
    • StereoData Maker
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #145 on: 18 / December / 2013, 16:55:45 »
Quote from: Karmaschinken on 18 / December / 2013, 16:42:34
Okay, thanks a lot, I got it.

I think gmail had been blocking the emails because the zip contained an exe (dancingbits.exe).

If you work out how it works, let me know, I have forgotten by now :)

Also, note the other item I mentioned in the last email.

After SDM 1.86 is released, many features will be removed  and a more minimal system designed.

'Power users' can use CHDK while I spend more time doing creative photography.

EDIT:

That code is still changing by the day and contains temporary debugging code.


David
« Last Edit: 18 / December / 2013, 17:58:58 by Microfunguy »
Logged
*

Offline waterwingz

  • ******
  • 12140
    • Waterwingz
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #146 on: 18 / December / 2013, 18:22:21 »
Quote from: andrew.stephens.754365 on 18 / December / 2013, 14:32:51
I can re-open the poll if anyone thinks it'd be useful?
I don't think anyone really cares.   

My comment simply answered your question.  The parody of your unique method of punctuating written English was intended to be Tongue-in-cheek. 

Frequent forum poster SticK also uses unique punctation.
Logged
Ported :   A1200    SD940   G10    Powershot N    G16
*

Offline Karmaschinken

  • ***
  • 198
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #147 on: 18 / December / 2013, 20:09:09 »
Quote from: Microfunguy on 18 / December / 2013, 16:55:45
Quote from: Karmaschinken on 18 / December / 2013, 16:42:34
Okay, thanks a lot, I got it.
David

David, may I ask you to send me the rest of the source too, not only for the SX200IS? And sorry, I'd really like to know why you won't post it puplic, as you are doing it under G Public L? Sorry for asking, but all in all I won't tie my rig to something that is not supported by a community but only a single person, even if SDM would be better here or there. I think you wouldn't do that too...

Thanks!
Logged
*

Offline Microfunguy

  • ****
  • 4037
    • StereoData Maker
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #148 on: 18 / December / 2013, 21:30:12 »
Quote from: Karmaschinken on 18 / December / 2013, 20:09:09
I'd really like to know why you won't post it puplic

I have made it clear the completed code will be included with the SDM official release as it ALWAYS has been with previous versions.
I do not post 'nightly development builds', it is impractical and of little interest.
Just tonight, I have  finished adding new code and removing temporary debugging code, it is in a state of constant change.
As an individual I do not have the time-commitment that a team of enthusiastic developers have.
I thought all your cameras were SX200is ?

Quote
I won't tie my rig to something that is not supported by a community

I do not recommend SDM for your application, multiple camera control via PTP is not supported.
Logged
*

Offline andrew.stephens.754365

  • ****
  • 461
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #149 on: 18 / December / 2013, 21:45:52 »
Quote from: waterwingz on 18 / December / 2013, 18:22:21
I don't think anyone really cares.   

Did you do a [secret] poll? in any case, your [current] offensive intent is clear.

Quote from: waterwingz on 18 / December / 2013, 18:22:21
The parody of your unique method of punctuating written English was intended to be Tongue-in-cheek. 

A parody can also be used to mock or trivialise http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody

Quote from: waterwingz on 18 / December / 2013, 18:22:21
your unique method of punctuating written English

Certainly not http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bracket

Suggestion:

  • We leave comedy to the comedians
  • You leave language construct interpretation to the linguists
  • Let bygones be bygones and continue to communicate about cameras
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Related Topics


SimplePortal © 2008-2014, SimplePortal