CHDK PTP multiple instances - page 18 - General Discussion and Assistance - CHDK Forum
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19   Go Down

CHDK PTP multiple instances

  • 180 Replies
  • 73463 Views
*

Offline ahull

  • *****
  • 634
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #170 on: 20 / December / 2013, 11:13:50 »
Advertisements
It is claimed there is one camera for every 11 people in the UK.... If you add in all personal cellphone and laptop cameras the gubmint is probably trying to hack to the mix, it does sound scarily like 1984.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/10172298/One-surveillance-camera-for-every-11-people-in-Britain-says-CCTV-survey.html

Logged
*

Offline srsa_4c

  • ******
  • 4451
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #171 on: 20 / December / 2013, 11:25:03 »
Quote from: Microfunguy on 20 / December / 2013, 10:11:36
I think it should be a rule that history is NEVER erased
Quote
« Last Edit: Today at 16:17:52 by Microfunguy »

I think being able to edit one's own posts is an important and useful feature, so it should be kept.
Logged
*

Offline Microfunguy

  • ****
  • 4037
    • StereoData Maker
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #172 on: 20 / December / 2013, 11:37:30 »
Quote from: srsa_4c on 20 / December / 2013, 11:25:03

I think being able to edit one's own posts is an important and useful feature, so it should be kept.

Yes, I agree, my logic was  flawed in that a poster could simply and laboriously delete the content of all his posts.
Logged
*

Offline Microfunguy

  • ****
  • 4037
    • StereoData Maker
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #173 on: 20 / December / 2013, 11:41:20 »
Quote from: Karmaschinken on 20 / December / 2013, 11:02:47
Must be christmas or something!  :xmas

As these off-topic posts will be moved anyway, I may as well add that you are not allowed to say Christmas in the US :)
Logged
*

Offline srsa_4c

  • ******
  • 4451
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #174 on: 20 / December / 2013, 11:44:17 »
Quote from: Microfunguy on 20 / December / 2013, 11:37:30
a poster could simply and laboriously delete the content of all his posts.
Well, that could be worked around with a change in the site's usage terms... and some admin/mod work.
Logged
*

Offline waterwingz

  • ******
  • 12140
    • Waterwingz
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #175 on: 20 / December / 2013, 11:49:10 »
Quote from: Microfunguy on 20 / December / 2013, 11:41:20
As these off-topic posts will be moved anyway, I may as well add that you are not allowed to say Christmas in the US :)
and now you are most definitely trolling  .. or reading the wrong left wing media...
Logged
Ported :   A1200    SD940   G10    Powershot N    G16
*

Offline msl

  • *****
  • 1280
  • A720 IS, SX220 HS 1.01a
    • CHDK-DE links
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #176 on: 20 / December / 2013, 13:00:05 »
Congratulation, Microfunguy, now is the topic really destroyed. ::)

No time for a right presentation of  source code but time for such discussion. That is our hero who knows what photographers need. :xmas

The deleting of posts is the responsibility of moderators and is not to discuss. A request to delete a post is a thing between posters and moderators. Other do not have this to decide.
Logged
CHDK-DE:  CHDK-DE links
*

Offline Microfunguy

  • ****
  • 4037
    • StereoData Maker
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #177 on: 20 / December / 2013, 13:46:10 »
Quote from: msl on 20 / December / 2013, 13:00:05
No time for a right presentation of  source code

http://trac.assembla.com/chdkde/browser/branches/SDM

Time for my Christmas break and looking forward to 2014.
Logged
*

Offline msl

  • *****
  • 1280
  • A720 IS, SX220 HS 1.01a
    • CHDK-DE links
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #178 on: 20 / December / 2013, 14:43:28 »
Oh, our hero tries to be funny - poor attempt. You make a fool of yourself.  :haha
Logged
CHDK-DE:  CHDK-DE links
*

Offline Karmaschinken

  • ***
  • 198
Re: CHDK PTP multiple instances
« Reply #179 on: 20 / December / 2013, 15:56:46 »
Quote from: Microfunguy on 20 / December / 2013, 13:46:10
http://trac.assembla.com/chdkde/browser/branches/SDM

Time for my Christmas break and looking forward to 2014.

David, am I getting it right that the last release of the whole SDM source happened back in 2011?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Related Topics


SimplePortal © 2008-2014, SimplePortal