IXUS 240/ELPH 320 HS Porting thread - page 16 - DryOS Development - CHDK Forum
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 ... 32   Go Down

IXUS 240/ELPH 320 HS Porting thread

  • 312 Replies
  • 139166 Views
*

Offline Mti.

  • *
  • 7
Re: IXUS 240/ELPH 320 HS Porting thread
« Reply #150 on: 05 / December / 2013, 13:37:52 »
Advertisements
Quote from: srsa_4c on 05 / December / 2013, 11:23:21
The differences are camera specific data, it looks normal to me. The assert-log in your dump is Canon Basic related, try renaming or removing the extend.m file (if it's there). The assert might also be a false lead, if you ever tried to run a Canon Basic script with errors.

Thank you for reply, but I am not sure if I understand what can I do.  :D
Yes, I have problems running dumper script before "successfull" dump.  When I renamed extend.m, I was not able to run dump. (It's ok, I expect)  In other way - chdk was tested before I ever know how to dump firmware, so if there is chance to colision...it's not the case. :-( ... or why to rename extend.m?  :-[
(log was created  with dump and contains 3 lines: Started , FF000000 dry , done )
If firmware is correct... what can one miss in chdk installation? (I have tried Fat16 on 2GB SD, fat32 on 16GB, card formated in camera or pc (fdisk + mkfs.vfat) ... :-( ) Or is there some older version which can be tried?

(I have tried another dup and yes, file is different again, so diff alone is useless for it. :-/ )
Logged
*

Offline nafraf

  • *****
  • 1308
Re: IXUS 240/ELPH 320 HS Porting thread
« Reply #151 on: 05 / December / 2013, 13:54:28 »
Quote from: Mti. on 05 / December / 2013, 13:37:52
If firmware is correct... what can one miss in chdk installation? (I have tried Fat16 on 2GB SD, fat32 on 16GB, card formated in camera or pc (fdisk + mkfs.vfat) ... :-( ) Or is there some older version which can be tried?
Hardware-Hacker reported that CHDK works for 102a.  Have you tried to load CHDK using Bootable sd-card?
Logged
*

Offline Mti.

  • *
  • 7
Re: IXUS 240/ELPH 320 HS Porting thread
« Reply #152 on: 05 / December / 2013, 14:00:59 »
Quote from: nafraf on 05 / December / 2013, 13:54:28
Hardware-Hacker reported that CHDK works for 102a.  Have you tried to load CHDK using Bootable sd-card?

Not yet. I have hoped to run chdk as fw upgrade and make it bootable from menu. I am going to give it try... will report soon. :-)

Edit: Oh hell! It works this way. :-(  I am sorry for previous posts. Thank you. (ixus 220 worked as fw upgrade, so I have expected it works both ways... :-) )
« Last Edit: 05 / December / 2013, 14:07:15 by Mti. »
Logged
*

Offline nafraf

  • *****
  • 1308
Re: IXUS 240/ELPH 320 HS Porting thread
« Reply #153 on: 05 / December / 2013, 14:46:17 »
fw upgrade method should work too, then you have found a bug in the port.
Logged
*

Offline Mti.

  • *
  • 7
Re: IXUS 240/ELPH 320 HS Porting thread
« Reply #154 on: 05 / December / 2013, 15:13:16 »
Quote from: nafraf on 05 / December / 2013, 14:46:17
fw upgrade method should work too, then you have found a bug in the port.

May be, but it's my shame not to test other way to boot. Bothering with "another" fw was a misslead. Sorry for it. :-/

I have played for a while and it looks great on that touch screen. :-)
Logged
*

Offline Hardware_Hacker

  • ****
  • 322
Re: IXUS 240/ELPH 320 HS Porting thread
« Reply #155 on: 05 / December / 2013, 21:23:58 »
Quote from: philmoz on 05 / December / 2013, 03:30:26
Quote from: Hardware_Hacker on 05 / December / 2013, 03:10:09
Reply #139 "...Did you actually try to run all three versions of CHDK on the same camera?..."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Reply #138 + Edit #1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


We can't tell if 1.00c requires a new version until you provide the firmware dump.

Phil.

This is still a "To-Do".

Results below are still from my Inital Test build of version CHDK-3260.

and My Inital Test results for version 100c and a Pre-Alpha Test build.

[3 camera versions and five cameras]

H_H

Continued .... post #156 and #157

« Last Edit: 06 / December / 2013, 21:27:39 by Hardware_Hacker »
Logged
*

Offline Hardware_Hacker

  • ****
  • 322
Re: IXUS 240/ELPH 320 HS Porting thread
« Reply #156 on: 05 / December / 2013, 21:35:19 »
Continued from #155

more Inital test results attached for 101a and 102a versions.

H_H

Edit #1 Continued to #157
« Last Edit: 06 / December / 2013, 21:13:23 by Hardware_Hacker »
Logged
*

Offline Hardware_Hacker

  • ****
  • 322
Re: IXUS 240/ELPH 320 HS Porting thread
« Reply #157 on: 06 / December / 2013, 21:11:59 »
Continued from #155 and #156

some more Inital test results attached for 100c and 100c versions.

On my Win-7 (Compile PC) I ran low on H-Disk space and when having a CHDK file clean up,
I decided to repeat my #155 test results which then produced very diffrent results, see attached files.
[6 Ixus 240 Cameras and 3 Ixus 240 versions. Aso The Camera "#'s" has now changed]

The difference here is that I, quickly, recycled some SD cards without reformating them.
My "NEW" 102a camera #5, while the recycled SD Card is in #3 and is the one that is now appears to be OK.

In post #156 I thought that the "Errors" were due to incomplete porting, comments anyone.
 
H_H
« Last Edit: 06 / December / 2013, 21:35:28 by Hardware_Hacker »
Logged
*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14111
Re: IXUS 240/ELPH 320 HS Porting thread
« Reply #158 on: 07 / December / 2013, 02:40:46 »
The "no file 'A/CHDK..." errors are most likely due to not have all the standard Lua libraries installed on the card.
Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
*

Offline Hardware_Hacker

  • ****
  • 322
Re: IXUS 240/ELPH 320 HS Porting thread
« Reply #159 on: 07 / December / 2013, 23:55:50 »
Quote from: reyalp on 07 / December / 2013, 02:40:46
The "no file 'A/CHDK..." errors are most likely due to not have all the standard Lua libraries installed on the card.

Yes, ...... All the Directories were empty except for modules Directory.

I think I have found one problem, the Ixus 240-100c camera are "Different" in some way.

I think I need to try to a Dump for each camera, see attached files, the difference here is that
I just swapped the SD Cards and repeated the test. Camera #3 is still the camera that is Ok.

Has this been a problem with any other Ports in the past ???.

H_H

Continued to #160
« Last Edit: 07 / December / 2013, 23:59:38 by Hardware_Hacker »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 ... 32   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Related Topics
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal