Source code re-org for modules?

  • 36 Replies
  • 3770 Views
*

Offline dvip

  • ****
  • 451
Re: Source code re-org for modules?
« Reply #30 on: 04 / January / 2013, 20:37:04 »
Advertisements
@Phil, [email protected], fine and dandy on my A590IS-101b and SX40HS-100i.

*

Offline msl

  • *****
  • 1215
  • A720 IS, SX220 HS 1.01a
    • CHDK inside
Re: Source code re-org for modules?
« Reply #31 on: 05 / January / 2013, 04:49:53 »
Merged trunk version runs without any significant problems. Test scripts were all ok, also imath. (Tested with A720 & SX220)

DE autobuild was created without problems.

Thanks for this great work.

msl
German CHDK pages:  CHDK forum | CHDK inside | CHDK Twitter News by msl | Download CHDK-DE (Autobuild)
Note: SDM violates the GPL rules!

Re: Source code re-org for modules?
« Reply #32 on: 05 / January / 2013, 10:07:25 »
Merged trunk version runs without any significant problems. Test scripts were all ok, also imath. (Tested with A720 & SX220).   DE autobuild was created without problems.
@msl : I've lost track of CHDK-DE.  Is there currently any difference between CHDK and CHDK-DE other than the default language ?
Ported : A1200  SD940  G10  Powershot N  G16*

*

Offline msl

  • *****
  • 1215
  • A720 IS, SX220 HS 1.01a
    • CHDK inside
Re: Source code re-org for modules?
« Reply #33 on: 05 / January / 2013, 10:38:02 »
@waterwingz

Menu language, splash screen logo and version name are different. All other things were merged. The last functional difference was the activated lua native calls as default. But Phil's menu option is the better way.

msl
German CHDK pages:  CHDK forum | CHDK inside | CHDK Twitter News by msl | Download CHDK-DE (Autobuild)
Note: SDM violates the GPL rules!


*

Offline zeno

  • *****
  • 880
Re: Source code re-org for modules?
« Reply #34 on: 27 / February / 2013, 06:00:45 »
I've just taken a look at core/conf.c to see if my CFG Editor needs updating. The last change I made was in October 2012, when I added a load of entries to do with user menu handling (ids 293-322) that were in build 2186. Today I downloaded build 2606 and all those entries have gone and entry 293 is now the last one (it's conf.extra_button).

Can I assume that the user menu stuff has gone, or is it still there in some other branch?

Apologies for asking here, but it seems the most likely place to get a definite answer.
A570, S100, Ixus 127
Author of ASSIST, STICK, WASP, ACID, SDMInst, LICKS, WICKS, MacBoot, UBDB, CFGEdit

*

Online philmoz

  • *****
  • 3043
    • Photos
Re: Source code re-org for modules?
« Reply #35 on: 27 / February / 2013, 06:28:28 »
I've just taken a look at core/conf.c to see if my CFG Editor needs updating. The last change I made was in October 2012, when I added a load of entries to do with user menu handling (ids 293-322) that were in build 2186. Today I downloaded build 2606 and all those entries have gone and entry 293 is now the last one (it's conf.extra_button).

Can I assume that the user menu stuff has gone, or is it still there in some other branch?

Apologies for asking here, but it seems the most likely place to get a definite answer.

It's all still there; but handled through the single 'user_menu_vars' config item (using the tUserMenuConfig structure).

Phil.
CHDK ports:
  sx30is (1.00c, 1.00h, 1.00l, 1.00n & 1.00p)
  g12 (1.00c, 1.00e, 1.00f & 1.00g)
  sx130is (1.01d & 1.01f)
  ixus310hs (1.00a & 1.01a)
  sx40hs (1.00d, 1.00g & 1.00i)
  g1x (1.00e, 1.00f & 1.00g)

*

Offline zeno

  • *****
  • 880
Re: Source code re-org for modules?
« Reply #36 on: 27 / February / 2013, 08:14:40 »
Thanks Phil - I've updated my editor accordingly.
A570, S100, Ixus 127
Author of ASSIST, STICK, WASP, ACID, SDMInst, LICKS, WICKS, MacBoot, UBDB, CFGEdit

 

Related Topics