Source code re-org for modules? - page 4 - General Discussion and Assistance - CHDK Forum
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Source code re-org for modules?

  • 36 Replies
  • 19125 Views
*

Offline dvip

  • ****
  • 451
Re: Source code re-org for modules?
« Reply #30 on: 04 / January / 2013, 20:37:04 »
Advertisements
@Phil, philmoz-reorg@2453, fine and dandy on my A590IS-101b and SX40HS-100i.
Logged
*

Offline msl

  • *****
  • 1280
  • A720 IS, SX220 HS 1.01a
    • CHDK-DE links
Re: Source code re-org for modules?
« Reply #31 on: 05 / January / 2013, 04:49:53 »
Merged trunk version runs without any significant problems. Test scripts were all ok, also imath. (Tested with A720 & SX220)

DE autobuild was created without problems.

Thanks for this great work.

msl
Logged
CHDK-DE:  CHDK-DE links
*

Offline waterwingz

  • ******
  • 12140
    • Waterwingz
Re: Source code re-org for modules?
« Reply #32 on: 05 / January / 2013, 10:07:25 »
Quote from: msl on 05 / January / 2013, 04:49:53
Merged trunk version runs without any significant problems. Test scripts were all ok, also imath. (Tested with A720 & SX220).   DE autobuild was created without problems.
@msl : I've lost track of CHDK-DE.  Is there currently any difference between CHDK and CHDK-DE other than the default language ?
Logged
Ported :   A1200    SD940   G10    Powershot N    G16
*

Offline msl

  • *****
  • 1280
  • A720 IS, SX220 HS 1.01a
    • CHDK-DE links
Re: Source code re-org for modules?
« Reply #33 on: 05 / January / 2013, 10:38:02 »
@waterwingz

Menu language, splash screen logo and version name are different. All other things were merged. The last functional difference was the activated lua native calls as default. But Phil's menu option is the better way.

msl
Logged
CHDK-DE:  CHDK-DE links
*

Offline zeno

  • *****
  • 891
Re: Source code re-org for modules?
« Reply #34 on: 27 / February / 2013, 06:00:45 »
I've just taken a look at core/conf.c to see if my CFG Editor needs updating. The last change I made was in October 2012, when I added a load of entries to do with user menu handling (ids 293-322) that were in build 2186. Today I downloaded build 2606 and all those entries have gone and entry 293 is now the last one (it's conf.extra_button).

Can I assume that the user menu stuff has gone, or is it still there in some other branch?

Apologies for asking here, but it seems the most likely place to get a definite answer.
Logged
A570, S100, Ixus 127
Author of ASSIST, STICK, WASP, ACID, SDMInst, LICKS, WICKS, MacBoot, UBDB, CFGEdit
*

Offline philmoz

  • *****
  • 3450
    • Photos
Re: Source code re-org for modules?
« Reply #35 on: 27 / February / 2013, 06:28:28 »
Quote from: zeno on 27 / February / 2013, 06:00:45
I've just taken a look at core/conf.c to see if my CFG Editor needs updating. The last change I made was in October 2012, when I added a load of entries to do with user menu handling (ids 293-322) that were in build 2186. Today I downloaded build 2606 and all those entries have gone and entry 293 is now the last one (it's conf.extra_button).

Can I assume that the user menu stuff has gone, or is it still there in some other branch?

Apologies for asking here, but it seems the most likely place to get a definite answer.

It's all still there; but handled through the single 'user_menu_vars' config item (using the tUserMenuConfig structure).

Phil.
Logged
CHDK ports:
  sx30is (1.00c, 1.00h, 1.00l, 1.00n & 1.00p)
  g12 (1.00c, 1.00e, 1.00f & 1.00g)
  sx130is (1.01d & 1.01f)
  ixus310hs (1.00a & 1.01a)
  sx40hs (1.00d, 1.00g & 1.00i)
  g1x (1.00e, 1.00f & 1.00g)
  g5x (1.00c, 1.01a, 1.01b)
  g7x2 (1.01a, 1.01b, 1.10b)
*

Offline zeno

  • *****
  • 891
Re: Source code re-org for modules?
« Reply #36 on: 27 / February / 2013, 08:14:40 »
Thanks Phil - I've updated my editor accordingly.
Logged
A570, S100, Ixus 127
Author of ASSIST, STICK, WASP, ACID, SDMInst, LICKS, WICKS, MacBoot, UBDB, CFGEdit
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Related Topics


SimplePortal © 2008-2014, SimplePortal