S110 Porting thread - page 8 - DryOS Development - CHDK Forum

S110 Porting thread

  • 105 Replies
  • 66925 Views
Re: S110 Porting thread
« Reply #70 on: 30 / June / 2016, 08:40:57 »
Advertisements
I went ahead and updated to firmware 1.0.2.0

I used STICK and it identified it as firmware 102b and CHDK is running well now.  :)

Thanks

*

Offline c_joerg

  • *****
  • 1251
Re: S110 Porting thread
« Reply #71 on: 27 / February / 2017, 12:19:15 »
I was interested in the entry 'FreeFall' from 'GetCameraInformationData'.
https://chdk.setepontos.com/index.php?topic=12542.300

My S110 has fallen once from 1m on the floor. I just read it. The S110 has much less information than the M3. Is also older ... but also she has the entry 'FreeFall'. But the value is 0. The camera was however switched off at the fall ...
M100 100a, M3 121a, G9x II (1.00c), 2*G1x (101a,100e), S110 (103a), SX50 (100c), SX230 (101a), S45,
Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/136329431@N06/albums
YouTube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrTH0tHy9OYTVDzWIvXEMlw/videos?shelf_id=0&view=0&sort=dd

*

Offline Mlapse

  • *****
  • 584
  • S95 S110
Re: S110 Porting thread
« Reply #72 on: 28 / August / 2019, 02:25:53 »
I see that 102B is still beta in the nightly builds, is there something untested for that version? because as far as I can see it works like a charm.
frustration is a key ingredient in progress

*

Offline c_joerg

  • *****
  • 1251
Re: S110 Porting thread
« Reply #73 on: 28 / August / 2019, 03:33:09 »
I see that 102B is still beta in the nightly builds, is there something untested for that version?

There is an official Canon Firmware 103a that you can download. For me there is no reason why I should take an older firmware...
M100 100a, M3 121a, G9x II (1.00c), 2*G1x (101a,100e), S110 (103a), SX50 (100c), SX230 (101a), S45,
Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/136329431@N06/albums
YouTube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrTH0tHy9OYTVDzWIvXEMlw/videos?shelf_id=0&view=0&sort=dd

*

Offline Mlapse

  • *****
  • 584
  • S95 S110
Re: S110 Porting thread
« Reply #74 on: 28 / August / 2019, 04:32:59 »
I went ahead and updated to firmware 1.0.2.0


Downloaded the file you mentioned earlyer, but that seems to contain 102 as TechGus mentioned. So I have not tried that.
Also because I am not really fond of flashing old hardware unless there is something wrong with the current version.
I've had too much dead hardware over the years to update because it is there.

and as far as I can tell 102B seems to work...only took me a few moments to find that the uneven numbers are the wifi led and the even numbers the AF led while setting up a script.
frustration is a key ingredient in progress

*

Offline c_joerg

  • *****
  • 1251
Re: S110 Porting thread
« Reply #75 on: 28 / August / 2019, 07:12:02 »
Also because I am not really fond of flashing old hardware unless there is something wrong with the current version.

For me that was enough for the update...

Quote
Firmware Version 1.0.2.0 incorporates the following fixes and improvements: 1. Fixes a phenomenon in which the focal length may not change when the control ring's function is to control the step zoom, and the control ring is turned slowly, click-by-click. (In AUTO, SCN, or Movie mode, the default function ...
M100 100a, M3 121a, G9x II (1.00c), 2*G1x (101a,100e), S110 (103a), SX50 (100c), SX230 (101a), S45,
Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/136329431@N06/albums
YouTube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrTH0tHy9OYTVDzWIvXEMlw/videos?shelf_id=0&view=0&sort=dd

*

Offline Mlapse

  • *****
  • 584
  • S95 S110
Re: S110 Porting thread
« Reply #76 on: 28 / August / 2019, 07:19:44 »
Quote
Firmware Version 1.0.2.0 incorporates the following fixes and improvements: 1. Fixes a phenomenon in which the focal length may not change when the control ring's function is to control the step zoom, and the control ring is turned slowly, click-by-click. (In AUTO, SCN, or Movie mode, the default function ...
[/quote]

although it is recognised by stick as 102B and sits in the right serial range (4 at position 6) to update
my cam already has version 1.0.2.0 as firmware, making it not possible to update.
it does run the CHDK build for 102B.
I do not experience any problems with setting the focal length (yet)
« Last Edit: 28 / August / 2019, 07:28:43 by Mlapse »
frustration is a key ingredient in progress

*

Offline c_joerg

  • *****
  • 1251
Re: S110 Porting thread
« Reply #77 on: 28 / August / 2019, 07:34:55 »
my cam already has version 1.0.2.0 as firmware, making it not possible to update.
it does run the CHDK build for 102B.

Firmware-Version 1.0.2.0 <=> 1.03a
M100 100a, M3 121a, G9x II (1.00c), 2*G1x (101a,100e), S110 (103a), SX50 (100c), SX230 (101a), S45,
Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/136329431@N06/albums
YouTube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrTH0tHy9OYTVDzWIvXEMlw/videos?shelf_id=0&view=0&sort=dd

*

Offline Mlapse

  • *****
  • 584
  • S95 S110
Re: S110 Porting thread
« Reply #78 on: 28 / August / 2019, 10:51:56 »
what can I say....102B hardwareversion 1.0.2.0.
btw no blue dot on the battery cover as mentioned in the canon update info.
« Last Edit: 28 / August / 2019, 11:07:36 by Mlapse »
frustration is a key ingredient in progress

*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14125
Re: S110 Porting thread
« Reply #79 on: 28 / August / 2019, 12:24:36 »
I see that 102B is still beta in the nightly builds, is there something untested for that version? because as far as I can see it works like a charm.
It doesn't mean much, mostly no one bothered to remove the label. The other S110 subs are "alpha"

I think if you and c_joerg have used this port extensively without problems, we can take the alpha/beta labels off.
Don't forget what the H stands for.

 

Related Topics


SimplePortal © 2008-2014, SimplePortal