IXUS 1000 HS Porting Thread - page 44 - DryOS Development - CHDK Forum
supplierdeeply
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45   Go Down

IXUS 1000 HS Porting Thread

  • 440 Replies
  • 167549 Views
*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 1096
Re: IXUS 1000 HS Porting Thread
« Reply #430 on: 08 / June / 2018, 13:21:53 »
Advertisements
Quote from: srsa_4c on 08 / June / 2018, 12:24:36
Anyway, here's a build with
Quote from: reyalp on 07 / June / 2018, 22:28:53
Code: [Select]
    #undef  CAM_HAS_IRIS_DIAPHRAGM
removed from platform_camera.h
How neat, you read that. I figured I would have to ask ;-) Thanks for reading my mind.
Logged
Koshy had a little ELPH which wasn't white as snow but everywhere that Koshy went the ELPH was sure to go. (actually an SD, but that detail ruins the rhyme...)
*

Offline unb

  • *
  • 2
Re: IXUS 1000 HS Porting Thread
« Reply #431 on: 07 / August / 2019, 09:12:02 »
Logged
*

Offline koshy

  • *****
  • 1096
Re: IXUS 1000 HS Porting Thread
« Reply #432 on: 07 / August / 2019, 15:07:54 »
Logged
Koshy had a little ELPH which wasn't white as snow but everywhere that Koshy went the ELPH was sure to go. (actually an SD, but that detail ruins the rhyme...)
*

Offline srsa_4c

  • ******
  • 4451
Re: IXUS 1000 HS Porting Thread
« Reply #433 on: 07 / August / 2019, 18:14:19 »
Quote from: unb on 07 / August / 2019, 09:12:02
i made a dump of 102c here
That's unlucky, differs from both 102b and 102d. I'll see if I can come up with a port...
Logged
*

Offline fe50

  • ******
  • 3147
  • IXUS50 & 860, SX10 Star WARs-Star RAWs
    • fe50
Re: IXUS 1000 HS Porting Thread
« Reply #434 on: 07 / August / 2019, 18:52:36 »
Quote from: fe50 on 07 / August / 2019, 18:52:06
Added the
  • IXUS 1000 / SD 4500 1.02C
full 8MB dump by unb from this forum post to the CHDK P&S FW dumps repository.
Logged
*

Offline srsa_4c

  • ******
  • 4451
Re: IXUS 1000 HS Porting Thread
« Reply #435 on: 08 / August / 2019, 16:18:14 »
Attached is a port for firmware 102c and the source diff. Basically, it's a copy of the 102d port with sources re-generated.
@unb Can you try and report whether it works?
Logged
*

Offline unb

  • *
  • 2
Re: IXUS 1000 HS Porting Thread
« Reply #436 on: 08 / August / 2019, 17:52:24 »
Quote from: srsa_4c on 08 / August / 2019, 16:18:14
Attached is a port for firmware 102c and the source diff. Basically, it's a copy of the 102d port with sources re-generated.
@unb Can you try and report whether it works?
I just tried it and as far as I can see, it works. I will report if something is wrong.
« Last Edit: 08 / August / 2019, 17:54:07 by unb »
Logged
*

Offline srsa_4c

  • ******
  • 4451
Re: IXUS 1000 HS Porting Thread
« Reply #437 on: 22 / August / 2019, 19:38:50 »
Quote from: unb on 08 / August / 2019, 17:52:24
I just tried it and as far as I can see, it works.
Thanks, I added this port to svn and enabled autobuild (it should work just as well as the 102d port).
Logged
*

Offline Eggplant

  • *
  • 3
Re: IXUS 1000 HS Porting Thread
« Reply #438 on: 04 / June / 2021, 14:42:00 »
Apologies for this bump.

I had a look through the thread but couldn't find an answer- is there potential for this camera to have an adjustable bitrate setting in video parameters, or is that not compatible? The CHDK specifications say that it records motion JPEGs, and if so apparently this allows the bitrate to be adjusted.

But I'm not actually sure it does- the video files it produces are H264. So is the wiki wrong?


« Last Edit: 04 / June / 2021, 14:51:07 by Eggplant »
Logged
*

Offline reyalp

  • ******
  • 14082
Re: IXUS 1000 HS Porting Thread
« Reply #439 on: 04 / June / 2021, 15:51:11 »
Quote from: Eggplant on 04 / June / 2021, 14:42:00
Apologies for this bump.
No need to apologize, the porting thread is the correct place for this question.
Quote
I had a look through the thread but couldn't find an answer- is there potential for this camera to have an adjustable bitrate setting in video parameters, or is that not compatible? The CHDK specifications say that it records motion JPEGs, and if so apparently this allows the bitrate to be adjusted.

But I'm not actually sure it does- the video files it produces are H264. So is the wiki wrong?
The Canon specs also say "motion jpeg" but cameras of this generation would be expected to be h264, and the code looks like that style. The CHDK port is set up for quality override only, as is normal for h264 cams.

So, unless there's something really weird going on, I'd say both the wiki and the canon specs are wrong.


Logged
Don't forget what the H stands for.
Pages: 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Related Topics